Steam installeren
inloggen
|
taal
简体中文 (Chinees, vereenvoudigd)
繁體中文 (Chinees, traditioneel)
日本語 (Japans)
한국어 (Koreaans)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgaars)
Čeština (Tsjechisch)
Dansk (Deens)
Deutsch (Duits)
English (Engels)
Español-España (Spaans - Spanje)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spaans - Latijns-Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Grieks)
Français (Frans)
Italiano (Italiaans)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Hongaars)
Norsk (Noors)
Polski (Pools)
Português (Portugees - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Braziliaans-Portugees)
Română (Roemeens)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Fins)
Svenska (Zweeds)
Türkçe (Turks)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamees)
Українська (Oekraïens)
Een vertaalprobleem melden
Maybe I can help you out, here. You said:
And then sar said:
So, it looks, to me, that Sar is asking you if "OG DOOM was very much a mindless shooter" or if "you [had] come up with a strategy to “solve” [E4M2 on Ultra-Violence]"?
Well, can you please define it, as you see it? Maybe then we can understand your subjective stance on the matter.
So in short you havn't played the classics.
Anything I say will undoubtedly be twisted into something else so I fail to see why I should indulge you.
ok, so if I give you the answer you seek, how will you know that I'm telling the truth and haven't just looked it up on YouTube?
Why on earth would anyone do that?
Me: Please define ____
SuperFly: No
Me: Please define ____
Erwin: No
Yep. I'm convinced.
Or maybe Erwin is Rebecca:
"Can you please clarify that which is already quite clear?"
Are Erwin, SuperFly, and Rebecca all the same? Oh, and 2024 because 2024 doesn't understand how an exact quote works, which indicates Rebecca.
Edit:
Definitely a Rebecca thing.
Clearly syntax isn't your strong point otherwise you would realise that you're quite wrong.
By all means believe what you will - matters not to me.
Edit: I really do recommend playing it.
Why should he answer? His words will just be twisted.
Edit: