Instale o Steam
iniciar sessão
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chinês simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Tcheco)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol — Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol — América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polonês)
Português (Portugal)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar um problema com a tradução
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3008123313
There's no way to spin that as a 'game in good state'. It sold well, initially, but had healthy pre-order extras like """Exclusive""" skins & DOOM64. DOOM:Eternal was rapidly rejected because it's poorly directed.
The handling of both Denuvo Anti-Cheat implementation as well as a current refusal to remove the anti-consumer Denuvo Anti-Tamper -- solidifies that in history.
If paying customers are boycotting a bad business like Denuvo on principle, it's probably best to avoid contracting them further for a service that's provably losing even more money.
Wait a few days after the sale ends for the player count to return to normal & ask him where his 2k is lol
As long as people stay consistent and accept that, by this logic, D16 was also a total failure, I don't have issue with that.
100% incorrect & has already been debunked as false in a previous thread, please stop spamming factually incorrect images.
It'll still be in a good place as it is right now, but let's continue to pretend that denuvo has any effect on the game, even thought it was already removed as per the player bases request.
It wasn't, check the storepage & other pages on this thread. please don't spread misinformation
The denuvo anti cheat which had the level 0 kernal access which people were concerned about was removed a while ago as per requests, this is a fact.
Why would I be asking to remove something that I've known for several pages ITT isn't there in the first place?
If you say so.
I've been discussing, & exclusively pointing to anti-tamper from literally page one
You joined the thread in the first 50 posts, so you would have seen me explicitly inform someone that DE didn't have AC anyway lol
I mean I'm grateful to take your misdirection/bait for the concession that it is lol, even Denuvo supporters can't come up with a reason not to remove it - ID/Bethseda take notes
It's hardly bait, i don't associate with those people on these forums.
"It wasn't, check the storepage & other pages on this thread. please don't spread misinformation"
You know what i was referring to & you still wanted to make accusations & deflect.
You had no reason to mention AC, I had no reason to believe you meant AC. What's more likely: that I forgot smth I didn't mention & have lectured other ppl on or that you didn't know & assumed DE only had AC or AT was removed with AC?
Edit: Either way, one of us started that mixup & it wasn't exactly me lol
Thank you for proving my point
You knew what i was talking about my dude.
Maybe Larian Studios needed to buy ID Software.