DOOM Eternal

DOOM Eternal

Ver estadísticas:
Why do the demons look like plush toys?
Why does the whole game look like a cartoon? Are they really going to go for that garbage 2016 look again?
< >
Mostrando 16-30 de 47 comentarios
rawWwRrr 17 ENE 2020 a las 18:25 
The fact that people take DOOM so seriously is a joke itself, or any game for that matter. It's meant as another of many sources of entertainment. If it isn't to your liking, then there's no reason to continue playing it or following it.

It always makes me wonder when people feel compelled to openly criticize a video game. There is certainly something more to their liking out there. Steam alone has a few thousand to pick from.
Kaizen 17 ENE 2020 a las 18:33 
It's not a joke.. something in this ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ world has to maintain integrity, it should be Doom.

also if i cared enough im ssure i could dig into your post history to find you whining about somethin somewhere
Última edición por Kaizen; 17 ENE 2020 a las 18:36
Publicado originalmente por Chard:
The tone of Doom has never been "serious business" (except in Doom 3, and Doom 3 was a crap departure from fun) the tone of Doom has always been larger than life and over the top, so the look of the demons reflect this, they're gross fun comic book exaggerations.

I always saw DOOM 1993 as a game that has serious overtones, DOOM 3 reflects this greatly as the technology was finally there to achieve this. DOOM 2 was kinda over the top yes (with a lot of demons and strange levels) but still had serious overtones to me.

DOOM 2016 is a cool game but it simply can't touch the awesomeness of Doom 1, 2, 3.
Kaizen 17 ENE 2020 a las 19:06 
3 isnt even a Doom game...
Bastila Shan 17 ENE 2020 a las 19:14 
Publicado originalmente por Gameo:
3 isnt even a Doom game...
Yes it is, just because fanboys dont recognize it as such doesnt mean they determine what reality is.
Kaizen 17 ENE 2020 a las 19:17 
No... it isn't.
It's just Carmack's tech demo in a Doom skin.
If it were to be considered anything, it'd be some kind of slow paced corridor horror shooter... in a doom skin
Salamand3r- 17 ENE 2020 a las 19:21 
Publicado originalmente por Gameo:
No... it isn't.
It's just Carmack's tech demo in a Doom skin.
If it were to be considered anything, it'd be some kind of slow paced corridor horror shooter... in a doom skin

I agree that Doom 3 isn't a Doom game, but we can't lay the blame at Carmack's feet on that one.

He built a great engine to be used for a game - Tim Willts is the one who decided to take the dynamic lighting and build a game around it. It was meant to be a tool to create whatever the creative team decided - and the creatively bankrupt team lead by Willts decided to use it in the most obvious, pointless, boring way possible.

As Camack said - Doom 3 could have been a great game. If you could see it.
Última edición por Salamand3r-; 17 ENE 2020 a las 19:22
Chard 17 ENE 2020 a las 19:29 
Publicado originalmente por I'll swallow your soul!:
Publicado originalmente por Chard:
The tone of Doom has never been "serious business" (except in Doom 3, and Doom 3 was a crap departure from fun) the tone of Doom has always been larger than life and over the top, so the look of the demons reflect this, they're gross fun comic book exaggerations.

I always saw DOOM 1993 as a game that has serious overtones, DOOM 3 reflects this greatly as the technology was finally there to achieve this. DOOM 2 was kinda over the top yes (with a lot of demons and strange levels) but still had serious overtones to me.

DOOM 2016 is a cool game but it simply can't touch the awesomeness of Doom 1, 2, 3.
Doom was made by a group of metal heads, metal is superficially "serious" but an exaggerated parody of seriousness. Metal is a combination of fun and awesome with some superficial horror painted over the surface. There are scary things, but you're not supposed to be afraid of them, they're just cool. When you see a revenant for the first time you're not supposed to be afraid, you're supposed to smile and say "♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ awesome". Doom is Metal \m/, not Emo.
Savage lion (Bloqueado) 17 ENE 2020 a las 20:26 
It actually was a doom game hence why it’s name was doom3 and was actually the best doom game that has been released everything after doom 3 has been a joke and a meme!
Publicado originalmente por Gameo:
3 isnt even a Doom game...
Savage lion (Bloqueado) 17 ENE 2020 a las 20:27 
Doom 3 was clearly a doom game if u need further assistance or clarification don’t hesitate to let me no so I can troubleshoot u further!
Publicado originalmente por Salamand3r-:
Publicado originalmente por Gameo:
No... it isn't.
It's just Carmack's tech demo in a Doom skin.
If it were to be considered anything, it'd be some kind of slow paced corridor horror shooter... in a doom skin

I agree that Doom 3 isn't a Doom game, but we can't lay the blame at Carmack's feet on that one.

He built a great engine to be used for a game - Tim Willts is the one who decided to take the dynamic lighting and build a game around it. It was meant to be a tool to create whatever the creative team decided - and the creatively bankrupt team lead by Willts decided to use it in the most obvious, pointless, boring way possible.

As Camack said - Doom 3 could have been a great game. If you could see it.
Chard 17 ENE 2020 a las 22:01 
Publicado originalmente por Savage lion:
Doom 3 was clearly a doom game if u need further assistance or clarification don’t hesitate to let me no so I can troubleshoot u further!
Yes, it's a doom game that has aged very poorly, was kind of a dull slog compared to the fast paced originals, and isn't nearly as well remembered as Doom 1 & 2.

I for one am shocked, shocked I tell you, that Id have chosen to model the modern games on the originals, 2 of the most beloved and well remembered games of all time with active communities to this day and not on the third game, which the majority of the fans feel was a major disappointment and a misguided departure from what made the originals fun.

They made a HUGE mistake not going back and modeling NuDoom off of the bad one.

The lighting was cool though.
Última edición por Chard; 17 ENE 2020 a las 22:02
Bastila Shan 17 ENE 2020 a las 22:25 
I didnt think doom 3 was bad, it was just something different.
Chard 17 ENE 2020 a las 22:44 
Publicado originalmente por Hoboslayer:
I didnt think doom 3 was bad, it was just something different.
In my personal opinion, it was merely OK. The engine was sexy as hell at the time, the technology was super impressive. I tried replaying it shortly after playing through DOOM 2016 when that came out, and Doom 3 did NOT hold up well in comparison.
rawWwRrr 17 ENE 2020 a las 23:34 
Publicado originalmente por Savage lion:
if u need further assistance or clarification don’t hesitate to let me no so I can troubleshoot u further!
No thank-you.
lol no 18 ENE 2020 a las 1:22 
The 2D Battlemode icons of the demons and the artwork that the community has done for Eternal shows that both classic and modern Doom's aesthetics are that of an edgy and comical cartoon, just with added gore.
< >
Mostrando 16-30 de 47 comentarios
Por página: 1530 50

Publicado el: 16 ENE 2020 a las 21:43
Mensajes: 47