DOOM Eternal

DOOM Eternal

View Stats:
What's the difference between Doom Guy and Master Chief?
Not much.

They look the same to me, from the 3rd person cut scenes to the transition of FPS game play.

They even jump around the same.

Anyway, Doom Eternal is not a FPS game changer.

Its a good game but not "Best thing to ever happen to the FPS genre"
< >
Showing 1-9 of 9 comments
Jinn-Gon Qui Mar 19, 2020 @ 7:06pm 
Doomguy is a pioneer.
From_Dust_Formed Mar 19, 2020 @ 7:07pm 
Originally posted by Jinn-Gon Qui:
Doomguy is a pioneer.

"was a"
Sad Pug Mar 19, 2020 @ 7:08pm 
Master Chief did not hit a gym once.
How can you not see Doomslayer steroid diet?
And yes, it is best thing to happen, because FPS stagnated hard for pretty long time because of Halo and CoD with their limitations of 2 weapons only, life-regen and other stuff.
Doom is a game that is refreshing in it's homage to old classic FPS games.
It's job wasn't re-inventing the wheel at all - just appricate good ol' fun.
Last edited by Sad Pug; Mar 19, 2020 @ 7:10pm
Jinn-Gon Qui Mar 19, 2020 @ 7:09pm 
Originally posted by From_Dust_Formed:
Originally posted by Jinn-Gon Qui:
Doomguy is a pioneer.

"was a"

No, he's a pioneer and he'll always be one. Same for B.J. Blazkowicz (who's the godfather of the genre).
Avenger_0047 Mar 19, 2020 @ 7:09pm 
And halo is? You wanna know what the difference is? Doomguy did it first and does it better to this day I know Id rather play Doom 2016 over halo 5. Sure 2016 and eternal will probably not change the fps genre, But they changed ID, and are a great step in the right direction
SunTV Mar 19, 2020 @ 7:10pm 
Master Chief is one of Doom Guy's offspring, looking up to his daddy but never really getting there
Dregora Mar 19, 2020 @ 7:12pm 
I don't really understand what you're trying to say, though? Doom did it first, doom did it better (although this is subjective).

Halo didn't change anything either and got worse over time, doom just got better.
From_Dust_Formed Mar 19, 2020 @ 7:20pm 
Originally posted by Dregora:
I don't really understand what you're trying to say, though? Doom did it first, doom did it better (although this is subjective).

Halo didn't change anything either and got worse over time, doom just got better.

Doom 3 included?

I guess what I'm getting at is that it's "not" the "Best thing to ever happen to the FPS genre"

It's not what Doom to Quake was in a leap for the genre or even the refresher that Doom 2016 was.

Its an improvement on the current "refresher" formula.

I suppose comparatively like what Doom to Doom 2 was.

Doom was 1993, quake was 1996.

Same time frame as Doom 2016 is to Eternal.

3 years.


MC is a bitсh.
< >
Showing 1-9 of 9 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Mar 19, 2020 @ 7:06pm
Posts: 9