Instalar o Steam
Iniciar sessão
|
Idioma
简体中文 (Chinês Simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês Tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol de Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol da América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Brasil)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar problema de tradução
Regras e Orientações das Discussões
0 
Denunciar este post
you can also play atelier game with keyboard and mouse
if your pc is weak yes is last resource for you ;^)
but you dont need strong pc for atelier game ^_^
I'd say for combat 60 fps does matter, as Atelier games tend to have pretty flash combat animations and moves. I played 3 Atelier games on Vita and in comparison to the 2 I played on PC, those were very laggy.
Only real advantage a Vita and now Switch have is their ability to play games on the move or just in a different position.
For quality of gameplay I'd advise PC, for portability a Switch.
unfortunally 360 controller doesnt work on xbox one
and ps3 controller doesnt work on ps4
and it is worst with nintendo controller :^(
so the 360 controller for pc work well with current video game ;^)
Save transfer between PC and Switch? That's...interesting. You brought up Sophie, though. Are all three games linked together then? I was told it doesn't matter which one I go into.
Also, I still don't know what resolutions Switch has for docked and portable modes, so an answer for that if somebody knows would be appreciated.
And no, the internet didn't help me due to the Atelier series being relatively obscure, for those who want to be a smartass and tell me to Google it. If you do know, just help me please and don't be rude. I'm obviously asking since I couldn't find the answer myself.
My advice to you is, if you've got a busy schedule and don't have a ton of time on your hands, the switch version may be the way to go. Sophie and Firis are both pretty long drawn out games that don't have clear cut goals. Lydie and Suelle has basically a check point story where you always know your goal, so you can pick it up and get work done in short sittings. So if this is the case with you, get Lydie and Suelle for the switch. If not, just buy it for PC. And as for the previous few games, I always recommend Sophie 100%, but Firis holds little value to the overall trilogy's plot, and it's expensive and a buggy port, and not on switch. So if you want to play on a budget, Sophie on PC, Lydie and Suelle on a console of your choosing.
They fixed the issues Firis had on PC. It ran very well for me on my laptop.
They are loosely connected. Firis being the second game set in the same world has some characters from Sophie. They dont expect you to know what happend in Sophie tho. When relevant they mention things in Firis.
Having played Sophie before is just a bonus of a sort when it comes to it.
So you can start whichever you want to start first.
Generally people advice playing Sophie first because:
-Its half the price on PC compared to Firis or Lydie
-It has no timelimit. Firis does, even if its a generous one...its still a timelimit with stress involved.
Between the two Firis is the better game tho. A much larger world, more interesting characters, and just a lot more to do. It even manages a better plot despite having less story, as a result of the characters side stories feeling more interesting then in Sophie.
And thats coming from me, who was very skeptical of Firis after Sophie, and waited over a year to finally buy it.
Really, your the first and only to prefer Sophie that ive seen.
Firis has some annoying things of its own like all the travel time, having a timelimit that adds unneeded pressure, and having to rank up your crafts (which takes some grinding).
But overall it improved on a lot of the things Sophie did poorly.
The characterization is far superior to Sophie for the most part. In Sophie I never used or even found half the cast enjoyable.
Oscar, Juno, Monica. Never used them at all except for their quests. They werent interesting in the slightest. Corneria was fun, but her story/dialogue either funny or non-existant. Harold was an interesting character that didnt really go very far. Fritz had some relevance in the plot atleast.
On top of that, Plachta (one of the 2 main characters) had horrible art/character design. Which is a shame since they based her off Ophelia from Atelier Ayesha, who had a very interesting character design.
In comparison, while Firis has less main story required to finish the game, its sidequests had actual plot. Sophies sidequests didnt.
On top of that, the dialogue and interactions were much better written then Sophie's, and there were more of them.
Sophie barely had any plot as well, with almost all of it compressed in the last section of the game. But since it lacked the plot in the sidecontent I'd definately give Firis a better scoring mark in the plot and story department.
It has literally all the traits and effects that Sophie does, and adds a bunch to them. While you are entitled to your opinion that they are stale....if you feel that way, you should also feel the same way about Sophies as they are the same kinds of traits...except theres less of them.
In fact I even used much of the same items as I did in Sophie. So im not sure what problem you had in Firis that you didnt have in Sophie?
I dont know when you actually saw that, tho. I played Firis recently (past week) And at this point the game is fixed for most, if not all. I'm well aware the game had a lot of issues at its launch as that was also part of the reason (aside from the price, and Sophie not being great) that I didnt purchase the game then.
Fact remains they appear to have to fixed all that, tho. For someone interested in the game now, instead of a year and a half in the past: thats all that matters.
Firis didnt sacrifice anything. It improves on much of the things that Sophie did wrong, while making mistakes of its own. Either way, even with its faults (some of which are frustrating), its still a much better game then Sophie. Even despite a timelimit (I hate timelimits).
And respectfully, you are quite wrong. The majority does agree that Firis > Sophie. It is that sentiment what ultimately convinced me to buy the game after all. Even after I really didnt want to give Koei anymore money.
Had I believed people saying Firis improved on much earlier then I had, I'd broughly had bought the game at release. Even with its issues and 60 euro pricetag.
Granted, Sophie was not my first Atelier game, but my 3th. And Firis is my 5th. So maybe my perspective is different from someone that only played Sophie?
Playing Ayesha after Sophie really reminded me just how low quality Sophies characterizations, dialogue and plot were.
Nevermind the art, which is terrible in both Sophie and Firis.
One thing I will give you tho: the best 2 characters from Sophie (3 if you count Harold) aren't in Firis. So that's definately a minus for the game.
What did you like about Sophie more? (im asking since im expecting you to have a more reasonable opinion then him)
Dont quite get why either. Characters like Sterk appearing in all 3 Arland games is part of the reason why its such a good trilogy. (and what made Meruru lots of fun for me, even if it has one of the worst designed Alchemist of all the series)
No Harold, Cornelia either.
Well, I guess Harold gets a kind-of-look-alike, and Cornelia does get an erm..doll.
Speaking of Escha and Logy...Logy is a pretty interesting character in the Mysterious series. Dont like Escha at all.