Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Insurgents in Squad definitely have access to attachments get out of here with that arguement.
I get that it's hard to learn to aim using irons in videogames, some casual experiences depict them wrong and make their players get used to aiming over the sights, or using the front only. So if you jump on a realistic/tactical/more detailed game like modded ravenfield/OHDS/GB/etc you might find it difficult to land your shots properly.
Brother, do you even read what you are writing? asymmetric warfare does exist, not to mention that it's not even that bad, having Iron Sights vs an Eotech is not that much of a difference not to mention that insurgents have the PKM meanwhile PMCs do not have any machine gun whatsoever, does this mean is that the PMC's are "far less superior" because they don't have exclusive access to machine guns? Come on, this is nothing new on similar games like Project Reality or Squad
Sounds good. Over all the game is enjoyable.
Project Reality and Squad has insurgents that don't have any access to optics (aside from bulky soviet optics that is limiting)
Bluedrake did mention there will be weapon customization though it will be restricted to what kind of faction, so if the faction is conventional or unconventional there will be a difference, either way you just have to adapt to different tactics