watched the demo were I'm supposed to be cheating + the valve employee that has the final say.... do they know what a player that is cheating looks like???? I'm sure they don't otherwise I wouldn't get a

be cheating + the valve employee that has the final say.... do they know what a player that is cheating looks like???? I'm sure they don't otherwise I wouldn't get a ban, this is extremely unfair.

here, but for now I'll go with you're a silver 1 with an ego problem.

4. Every single good player that I've played LANs with for years have completely quit the game and refuse to play again until Valve

isnt only for CSGO any valve game has it putting it in a single update makes no sense the more we ban people report them the better like i said no one gives it a chance to settle

F2P Being good is good

know for sure that being toxic and showiing incoherent beheaviour would not help the situation but this is not a situation to solve its a problematic huge issue that ruins everyones experience and Valve

Valve itself.
[/quote]
The player count doubled.

We, the community,

Speak for yourself. You are not the community.

are not pleased with this decision, along with many other

still use 60Hz monitor, having a 128 tick server would give unfair advantage to other people. Valve also sometimes did a survey on the spec, so I'm certain that staying at 64 tick is the right choice

, br mode = dead game, f2p = instantly cheaters go up by 110%, f2p = we want a refund of $15 even though we probably have spent over $100 on keys but somehow thats ok, br = valve is now ea in our eyes

, super glitchy game mode
-Making CSGO the new 'PUBG Ripoff'
-A more casual focused gameplay rather than competetive
-Less people in other valve servers leaving them full of bots (war games, deathmatch

, but we have esea and faceit for the mode your talking about, people didn't want intrusive so valve listened. So vac is not intrusive, esea is, though as mentioned the bit mining thing happened. Too much