Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

View Stats:
Sneed Sep 2, 2013 @ 9:30am
if your team has a quitter, you shouldnt be penalized
seems to be happening more often now that skins and cases are available. week ago i got deranked after we had 2 BRs quit after both started 0-7, score was like 2-5 at the time, still winnable, but not after they quit. we surrender, lose rank.

just had another where we had a quitter, then after that a troll on our team because of the quitter, so we booted him, then another go AFK, so its 2v5 with an afk and 2 bots. didnt lose any rank, but i can be sure im not closer to ranking up, i did win 2 in a row last night before this game today.

dont you think its fair to not penalize the team who has quitters/DCs? other team should still get some points towards ranking up because they probably made the kids rage quit.
< >
Showing 1-8 of 8 comments
Terror Sep 2, 2013 @ 9:32am 
Chances are when you play this also happens to the other team and u get the win and the points..... Its generally equilized... so dont dwell on the failures and the Losses.... look at the full picture as an avergae...
NevarLose Sep 2, 2013 @ 9:32am 
I think its a lose lose scenerio - I wouldn't comment without some advice though :) Try to team up with people you know.
Sneed Sep 2, 2013 @ 9:37am 
Originally posted by Terror:
Chances are when you play this also happens to the other team and u get the win and the points..... Its generally equilized... so dont dwell on the failures and the Losses.... look at the full picture as an avergae...


i know it goes both ways. when i play against a team that has a quitter i tell them "sorry for the leaver" because its a win 90% of the time. if a team has a bot, just rush a spot, they are usually short no matter which site you are rushing.

a team with a leaver shouldnt get penalized/deranked for games like this, seems unfair, as i lost rank with 2 quitters on my team before, nobody else should have to suffer a derank because of it either. winning teams should get a win/rank towards moving up though
Terror Sep 2, 2013 @ 9:39am 
IT will be abused.... i play in a team of 5 that usually changes every 2 games... someone would just leave and get the 30min cooldown just to not loose... would get ALOT MORE LEAVERS!!!!.... think this one through :P
reeckstar Sep 2, 2013 @ 9:42am 
Having 1 bot isn't necessarily bad. If you tell it to hold position your best player can play twice :D
Sneed Sep 2, 2013 @ 9:47am 
Originally posted by Terror:
IT will be abused.... i play in a team of 5 that usually changes every 2 games... someone would just leave and get the 30min cooldown just to not loose... would get ALOT MORE LEAVERS!!!!.... think this one through :P

yeah, think it through. they keep leaving enough they would just get cooldowns that keep gettign longer and longer
Sneed Sep 2, 2013 @ 9:49am 
Originally posted by Fiddlesticks:
Having 1 bot isn't necessarily bad. If you tell it to hold position your best player can play twice :D


i agree 1 bot isnt always bad, but your best player shouldnt be dying first. plus you want the bot in action asap, not waiting for a certain player to control it.

something should be done about losing rank on a 4v5 game though, just seems wrong
Bazza Oct 27, 2015 @ 2:47am 
IKR if one of you mates quit, your ELO points shouldn't change.
< >
Showing 1-8 of 8 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Sep 2, 2013 @ 9:30am
Posts: 8