Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

View Stats:
.bαd oNYx Mar 27, 2013 @ 5:01am
What's the point of AUG and SG553?
Title says it all. Both guns do less damage than M4 and AK (especially AK) and have lower farerate than those two guns and cost so much to buy. I've watched tons of pro matches (NiP, Verygames, Fnatic etc.) and I never ever saw anyone using AUG or SG. Those guns have nothing to offer except for lame sniper (and when zoomed, it has even lower firerate)
I see it like this, if I'm gonna spend 3500$ on a rifle, than it at least has gotta do one shot kills (headshots).
What's your opinion?
Last edited by .bαd oNYx; Nov 14, 2014 @ 10:22am
< >
Showing 1-15 of 57 comments
polite horse Mar 27, 2013 @ 5:32am 
I agree, AUG and SG553 is too weak!
It should have better accuracy when spraying and a longer zoom-in and a transcurrent red dot would be great!
(imo)
Last edited by polite horse; Mar 27, 2013 @ 5:32am
B[A]lto Mar 27, 2013 @ 5:33am 
Works fine for me. Not sure what your problem is with it. Don't like it then don't use it. Some people like using it sometimes, like me. I like being able to zoom in when I want to but don't want a sniper rifle.
.bαd oNYx Mar 27, 2013 @ 5:43am 
Originally posted by Baltow0lf:
Works fine for me. Not sure what your problem is with it. Don't like it then don't use it. Some people like using it sometimes, like me. I like being able to zoom in when I want to but don't want a sniper rifle.
My problem is that u pay 1000$ more for a rifle that has lower base damage than AK and can't kill opponent with one shot kill. The price of those guns dosen't justify it's campabilites, so 85-95% of players don't use them at all. Plus recoil sucks on both guns, u don't ever wanna spray with 'em, and if u get killed it hurts ur economy very much...
If they buffed just damage to the head a lot of players would start to use them, probably in high level competitve also.
Last edited by .bαd oNYx; Mar 27, 2013 @ 5:46am
polite horse Mar 27, 2013 @ 5:48am 
Originally posted by oNYx:
Originally posted by Baltow0lf:
Works fine for me. Not sure what your problem is with it. Don't like it then don't use it. Some people like using it sometimes, like me. I like being able to zoom in when I want to but don't want a sniper rifle.
My problem is that u pay 1000$ more for a rifle that has lower base damage than AK and can't kill opponent with one shot kill. The price of those guns dosen't justify it's campabilites, so 85-95% of players don't use them at all. Plus recoil sucks on both guns, u don't ever wanna spray with 'em, and if u get killed it hurts ur economy very much...
If they buffed just damage to the head a lot of players would start to use them, probably in high level competitve also.

+1
Marshall Mar 27, 2013 @ 5:54am 
The point is that you can kill an entire team with accurate headshots at all distances, AUG is currently the only CT rifle I like
.bαd oNYx Mar 27, 2013 @ 6:01am 
Originally posted by »SaNe391™:
The point is that you can kill an entire team with accurate headshots at all distances, AUG is currently the only CT rifle I like
Even if u hit someone on the head, u do 90hp damage and if u are zooming than u move so slow, so that makes u a easy kill for someone who's skilled with AK...
Last edited by .bαd oNYx; Mar 27, 2013 @ 6:05am
cons1stency Mar 27, 2013 @ 6:15am 
It's been like this for 500 years. I suggest you go and play CoD if you do not like it.
.bαd oNYx Mar 27, 2013 @ 2:09pm 
Originally posted by cons1stency`:
It's been like this for 500 years. I suggest you go and play CoD if you do not like it.
lol @ your answer. Dont' give me that CoD crap. I've been playing CS since beta 8 (yes, before the first release of CS) and for last 500 years you didn't have Bizon, P2000 etc.
Last edited by .bαd oNYx; Mar 27, 2013 @ 2:35pm
[kbm] mykov Mar 27, 2013 @ 2:47pm 
I do better with SG553 when on T side than AK
same for CT, I do better when using AUG instead of the M4.
it depends on the situation though, I am adaptable so if I happen to pick up an m4 or ak it's not the end of the world for my competetive team lol
Isaac :D Mar 27, 2013 @ 7:23pm 
They should just add non-removable silencers to them so there is a tradeoff that makes them worth it in some situations.
Speedie Mar 27, 2013 @ 7:40pm 
I think that if they both delivered one shot headshots they would be worth the money and be used more. especially for the cts.
CidBravo Mar 27, 2013 @ 7:49pm 
AUG n COMM have improved long range snipe(the viewfinder) and better close rang spray(n pray).... but dont listen to me, im bad.
GuNNuP Mar 28, 2013 @ 12:09am 
I kill both AK and M4 all the time with tha Aug and the other thingy. Personally i like them better than auto snipers. Aim for the head and when zoomed in its much easier, and the recoils is much tighter when crouched at full auto. Its not a gun for running around, youll have low maneuverablility
UchihaBlood305 Mar 28, 2013 @ 12:10am 
i love getting headshots with the ak thats all i know, once with an ak i headshotted an awp from b all the way to a. after u practice it gets easier. just stare at the little dot.
Last edited by UchihaBlood305; Mar 28, 2013 @ 12:10am
Álex Callejón Mar 28, 2013 @ 6:58am 
I don't mind having useless guns in a game becuase I want variety in what I'm using. Even when they are more expensive or worse (not in comp mode though lol).
< >
Showing 1-15 of 57 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Mar 27, 2013 @ 5:01am
Posts: 57