Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (chino tradicional)
日本語 (japonés)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandés)
Български (búlgaro)
Čeština (checo)
Dansk (danés)
Deutsch (alemán)
English (inglés)
Español de Hispanoamérica
Ελληνικά (griego)
Français (francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (húngaro)
Nederlands (holandés)
Norsk (noruego)
Polski (polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português-Brasil (portugués de Brasil)
Română (rumano)
Русский (ruso)
Suomi (finés)
Svenska (sueco)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraniano)
Comunicar un error de traducción
If it's a map glitch - then no. At least I think so.
That's what I thought too, but its obviously a pretty hard glitch,
invisible, unattackable, through wall vision...
Nice answer so far. But nothing. He is CT -> Bomb get planted. -> He killed one from INSIDE. -> He gets outside and then frags 2 guys onspot and defused. It pretty much decided the round.
Unattackable? i dont think so....
Technically bug abusing is not griefing as long as it doesnt harm your team
I would vote Insufficient for that glitch.
I mean you can just place a box in front of the spot and the bug is fixed
It's not just getting behind the wall to protect yourself, it gives you vision right into B site that you would not normally have, without peeking the area and risking getting shot / spotted yourself.
Agreed, if it impacted gameplay then yes i would vote for the griefing as it is disruptive, and/or anti-competitive, if he was just going there, lets say, after rounds ended or such, where it didn't affect the game then I would vote insufficient.
Since you said it won him the round I would vote to convict next time.