2025 and the game still with bad performance?

[treev0r]

for play this game with good fps we all need high end pc?
wtf u guys doing?

low settings, low resolution and the game with the worst performance i ever seen.

[♛⁧Schultheiß]

If lowering the graphics doesn't help much, it might be time to get a better cpu

[DOGGY MCDOGGO]

Play without your cheats and you'll see how good the performances are

[Admiral]

You don't need high end PC for a light load like CS2. Just something relatively modern and the game runs fine. Solid 200-300 fps easily.

[EmilFLarsen]

Originally posted by Admiral:

You don't need high end PC for a light load like CS2. Just something relatively modern and the game runs fine. Solid 200-300 fps easily.

CS2 requires a GTX 1080 as minimum requirement and even then it doesn't run well. You need a RTX graphics card to get decent performance but the stuttering and subrickrate makes it unbearable to play.

[grog]

Originally posted by EmilFLarsen:

Originally posted by Admiral:

You don't need high end PC for a light load like CS2. Just something relatively modern and the game runs fine. Solid 200-300 fps easily.

CS2 requires a GTX 1080 as minimum requirement and even then it doesn't run well. You need a RTX graphics card to get decent performance but the stuttering and subrickrate makes it unbearable to play.

A game released in 2023 requires current gen hardware to play, I think that makes perfect sense no?

[EmilFLarsen]

Originally posted by BigShot:

Originally posted by EmilFLarsen:

CS2 requires a GTX 1080 as minimum requirement and even then it doesn't run well. You need a RTX graphics card to get decent performance but the stuttering and subrickrate makes it unbearable to play.

A game released in 2023 requires current gen hardware to play, I think that makes perfect sense no?

No, not CS2. Counter Strike has always been accessible for nearly everyone due to lower hardware specs. Valve should prioritize optimization because by not optimizing their game they're excluding large parts of communities around the world. Current subtickrate and stuttering is terrible but Valve insists on pouring lootcrates down our throats, adding keychains and changing small animations instead of actually fixing the core game. Look up gameplay of Battlefield 3 and tell me CS2 looks better than that game; a game you can run in ultra settings with a GTX 680ti (a GPU that can't run CS2).

[ꂵꍏꀤꀘꍟ꒒ꌗꂦꈤ 🎔]

Maybe spend more then 3$ on ur computer?

[🐠🍑]

Originally posted by EmilFLarsen:

Look up gameplay of Battlefield 3 and tell me CS2 looks better than that game; a game you can run in ultra settings with a GTX 680ti (a GPU that can't run CS2).

On March 22, 2012, Nvidia unveiled the 600 series GPU.

Its 2025 its time for new hardware.

[Certified Auto User™]

Originally posted by EmilFLarsen:

Originally posted by BigShot:

A game released in 2023 requires current gen hardware to play, I think that makes perfect sense no?

No, not CS2. Counter Strike has always been accessible for nearly everyone due to lower hardware specs. Valve should prioritize optimization because by not optimizing their game they're excluding large parts of communities around the world. Current subtickrate and stuttering is terrible but Valve insists on pouring lootcrates down our throats, adding keychains and changing small animations instead of actually fixing the core game. Look up gameplay of Battlefield 3 and tell me CS2 looks better than that game; a game you can run in ultra settings with a GTX 680ti (a GPU that can't run CS2).

and make us all with computers released anywhere close to new suffer? yeah right just play csgo

[Sergey Popofikki]

Theres literaly no reason for this game to run worse than something like battlefield, the trend of the consumer having to upgrade their pc instead of the billion dollar companies actually optimizing their games is aweful. The fact theres people white knighting these devs is insane to me. Defending these practices that make yourself spend more money on your rig is the most low iq move possible.

[EmilFLarsen]

Originally posted by Sergey Popofikki:

Theres literaly no reason for this game to run worse than something like battlefield, the trend of the consumer having to upgrade their pc instead of the billion dollar companies actually optimizing their games is aweful. The fact theres people white knighting these devs is insane to me. Defending these practices that make yourself spend more money on your rig is the most low iq move possible.

Yes, exactly. These people only think about themselves and not the millions of people running second hand devices. CS2 could be optimized so much more making it accessible to the gamers who ran CSGO fine; a game upgrade that were forced upon them and thereby taking away their paid game that they were able to run.

[kabanod1m #NotoToxicity]

Originally posted by EmilFLarsen:

Originally posted by Admiral:

You don't need high end PC for a light load like CS2. Just something relatively modern and the game runs fine. Solid 200-300 fps easily.

CS2 requires a GTX 1080 as minimum requirement and even then it doesn't run well. You need a RTX graphics card to get decent performance but the stuttering and subrickrate makes it unbearable to play.

lol I had 120-180 fps (on a 60 hz monitor) with a GTX 1070, not even Ti, Xeon E3 1270-v2 and 16 GB DDR3 RAM @1333 Mhz and had no stutters whatsoever

something is wrong with your operating system and other software, try reinstalling Windows or installing amother instance alongside your current one and you'll see that 1080 (with a CPU that can unleash everything that GPU has got obviously) is more than enough unless you're aiming for 300+ fps

by the way that cpu that I had costed me around $15 on aliexpress. yes, it's after being used on a server farm, but it's still not dead, it still runs perfectly.

on that computer CS2 never froze ONCE by the way, and in CSGO it was freezing for a long time A LOT. I have videos of enemies peeking me and my game (CSGO) freezing up completely for like 3 seconds and by the time I was getting control over the game again I was obviously already dead.
it never happened even ONCE in CS2 on that exact computer with no changes, on that exact operating system with no changes. how do I not "whiteknight" Valve for this when I'm so thankful that they fixed this issue that I had?

however yeah, of course I can roll back my GPU driver on my current very high-end PC to a version where I'll be getting constant stutters in CS2 (I know such a version exists, just don't remember which one, I updated and stutters were gone) and then come here and complain how broken the game is. I could even record a video while I'm at it, show my specs, and show how the game is stuttering horribly.
and then I'll proceed to do absolutely NOTHING to fix it, even though it's my system causing me issues, and I'll call everybody whose game runs fine stupid for defending Valve. what a great plan.


enough ot this forsaken place for today