Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Just wanted to bring this to the first page of this discussion so that people coming here can immediately understand what is going on.
Which is — this is a speculation topic, without anything mentioned in it actually happening. OP just forgot to add this little disclaimer.
i asked weather it was a guy at valve that leaked the code and your reply is:
"you have no proof."
that would matter if i made a claim. that's why i was asking. you must be so sad about me always having proof and sources to back the facts i post up while all you can do is ad hominem at best.
btw you can see the question mark at the end of my sentece if you focus really hard.
there were cheats in cs2 before the game was released.
how would that be possible if there wasn't someone inside valve leaking the game to cheat developers for profit ?
were valve servers hacked again ?
all premium cheats have key logging software, bot netting software and crypto mining software.
every cheater that posts "blocked user show" in this thread is 100% being mined and keylogged.
"cheat devs" do not develop cheats anymore, they resell subscriptions in form of "serial numbers" which they aquire from anonymous darknet sources (most likely chinese secret service) and order a nice and fresh GUI menu with it, so everybody thinks it's a new cheat from a new team.
If your only proof of a source code leak taking place is the fact that there are cheats for this game — I'll surprise you, but you don't need a game's source code to create a cheat for it.
>doesn't know cheats have been available even before the realease of the limited test
found your problem.
I'll take for example a youtube video or a twitter (X) post, showcasing a cheat used in a CS2 build that predates the Limited Test start, dated before Limited Test's start as proof.
without proof this conversation is pointless.
Aren't you encouraging people to cheat because you're parodying what cheats are and making them sound cooler than they actually are?
every single cheat is a repack of chinese spyware mining crypto on your hardware.
and there is 0 way for cheaters making it look it it isn't.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwruk-tLIOU
i cannot even count the number of times that you were owned.
you have yet to make a single correct statement.
there were cheats in the beta.
before the release of the limited test.
or post a timestamp (in the "minutes:seconds" format) of the moment that made you believe your claim is correct.
I can't find anything about it online.
This question implies that someone leaked the cs2 code to cheat makers as a fact.
Yes, that's a claim you made without proof. That's why the user asked you for proof.
Also the title of the post.
Is a direct statement, I don't even see that question mark you're trying so hard to hide behind.
So, where is proof for the statement you made? You claim to have proof, so where is it?