Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

View Stats:
vac cooldowns for "irregular gameplay"
playing with my friend and he keeps getting his gameplay flagged as "irregular", which in turn gets me the ban too because we're in the same party ...

we BOTH checked his pc looking for anything that could be causing these issues and bro literally has NOTHING even remotely close to being counted as a cheat, he's not using any macros, his mouse and keyboard have none too.

im extremely confused??? valve please
< >
Showing 1-15 of 87 comments
if you smurf account you can get ban
Does he have multiple accounts? Was he using a scout?

There are many rumors going around as to whats causing this issue.
I have the same problem, I'm the one getting flagged and now me and my mates can't play for a week it's maddening
Lol cheaters admitting guilt thread LMAO
Originally posted by Hamless Hog:
Does he have multiple accounts? Was he using a scout?

There are many rumors going around as to whats causing this issue.
It’s not a rumor when you look at the vast majority of the complaints and which accounts are making them. In other words, Ham, they’re cracking down on suspected smurfing. The collective punishment is by design, and if it wasn’t the OP or their friend, it could easily be someone who got queued with them automatically :starhappy:
Exactly. Anyone claiming false bans are speaking fiction.
Originally posted by 🎃TehSpoopyKitteh🐈‍⬛:
Originally posted by Hamless Hog:
Does he have multiple accounts? Was he using a scout?

There are many rumors going around as to whats causing this issue.
It’s not a rumor when you look at the vast majority of the complaints and which accounts are making them. In other words, Ham, they’re cracking down on suspected smurfing. The collective punishment is by design, and if it wasn’t the OP or their friend, it could easily be someone who got queued with them automatically :starhappy:
Do you have any evidence of this? Youve said a lot of false things about these issue with the bans.
Originally posted by The Masked Millionaire:
Exactly. Anyone claiming false bans are speaking fiction.
Who are you responding to?
Originally posted by Hamless Hog:
Originally posted by 🎃TehSpoopyKitteh🐈‍⬛:
It’s not a rumor when you look at the vast majority of the complaints and which accounts are making them. In other words, Ham, they’re cracking down on suspected smurfing. The collective punishment is by design, and if it wasn’t the OP or their friend, it could easily be someone who got queued with them automatically :starhappy:
Do you have any evidence of this? Youve said a lot of false things about these issue with the bans.
What specifically have I said that was false? That they’re actually cooldowns?
seems like whatever update to vacnet they did is causing actual false positives. was flagged for a comp match of dust2 where i kept buying scout and was playing pretty well.
Originally posted by 🎃TehSpoopyKitteh🐈‍⬛:
Originally posted by Hamless Hog:
Do you have any evidence of this? Youve said a lot of false things about these issue with the bans.
What specifically have I said that was false? That they’re actually cooldowns?
Thats a weird way to say you dont have any evidence again. You were claiming the cooldowns were for ghosting with ZERO evidence. So why keep being so dishonest?
Lol another fiction speaker admitting guilt with the false ban claim hahaha. You can't make this up lmao
I was recently banned for 31 days for irregular gameplay, even though I was playing normally without any cheats. Could someone tell me what’s going on? Is it possible that VACnet is bugged?
Originally posted by Hamless Hog:
Originally posted by 🎃TehSpoopyKitteh🐈‍⬛:
What specifically have I said that was false? That they’re actually cooldowns?
Thats a weird way to say you dont have any evidence again. You were claiming the cooldowns were for ghosting with ZERO evidence. So why keep being so dishonest?
I said that some cases most likely involved ghosting, based on the circumstances I referenced. I did not claim that Valve explicitly identified those cooldowns as being for ghosting (seriously, why would they reveal that). What specific statement was false, and what evidence disproves the inference I made?
Originally posted by 🎃TehSpoopyKitteh🐈‍⬛:
Originally posted by Hamless Hog:
Thats a weird way to say you dont have any evidence again. You were claiming the cooldowns were for ghosting with ZERO evidence. So why keep being so dishonest?
I said that some cases most likely involved ghosting, based on the circumstances I referenced. I did not claim that Valve explicitly identified those cooldowns as being for ghosting. What specific statement was false, and what evidence disproves the inference I made?
Yeah, that was very misleading remember.. youi keep avoiding the question, why are you being so rude?
< >
Showing 1-15 of 87 comments
Per page: 1530 50