Instalează Steam
conectare
|
limbă
简体中文 (chineză simplificată)
繁體中文 (chineză tradițională)
日本語 (japoneză)
한국어 (coreeană)
ไทย (thailandeză)
български (bulgară)
Čeština (cehă)
Dansk (daneză)
Deutsch (germană)
English (engleză)
Español - España (spaniolă - Spania)
Español - Latinoamérica (spaniolă - America Latină)
Ελληνικά (greacă)
Français (franceză)
Italiano (italiană)
Bahasa Indonesia (indoneziană)
Magyar (maghiară)
Nederlands (neerlandeză)
Norsk (norvegiană)
Polski (poloneză)
Português (portugheză - Portugalia)
Português - Brasil (portugheză - Brazilia)
Русский (rusă)
Suomi (finlandeză)
Svenska (suedeză)
Türkçe (turcă)
Tiếng Việt (vietnameză)
Українська (ucraineană)
Raportează o problemă de traducere
High rank usage statistics now:
47% a1
53% a4
How is that not balanced? Earlier a1 users were the overwhelming majority.
Source?
Because im personally playing now in Supreme and trust me, like 4 out of 5 people use M4A4 and that is at least 80%. Also take a look at pro's, there are only few left who still use a1 over a4.
Dont you get it?
Fighting at close range is not really about perfect spray control its more about the gun (especially now) and that is WRONG.
So lets say it again.
A1 before the nerf had more Rate of Fire but AK had more damage so those 2 were pretty 50/50 in close range situations. Now A1 has lower RoF and lower damage just like A4 has so that puts TT's in a very favorable position. Get it?
Verified valve dev on reddit
That must be the best argument i heard on this thread. Oh wait, all of them looks exactly like that lol.
Not gonna waste half day finding it but its 100% fake i tell you.
Just watch some pro's streams/tournaments after the nerf or just watch some global/supreme matches at CS:GO. If you find more than 1 person in team playing A1, well you're lucky as hell coz it didnt ever happen to me tho.
I totally do agree on that.
Agree, m4a1-s being nerfed but having an advantage on long range and it is easier to tap rather than using M4A4 which is usually effective around cqb to medium range.
But disadvantage in short range is for both m4's as the main factors that count in short range are damage and rof and they remain the same while AK is so far superior in that area because of significantly higher damage and same RoF.
Thats why i say they shouldnt nerf RoF or they should buff rof for a4. Anything just to give some actual chance for ct's to fight at short range rather than running around with mag-7.
Mad cuz bad? Or jealous?
Sorry for you, but there are some people on this world that understand and learn certain things faster and better than others. Some people call it talent.
I see you are just a troll then since it took me 4 minutes to find it (without web history). I am not arguing with trolls so I unsub the thread, bye.
Good.
Maybe finally some people with actual knowledge, brain and game understanding come here so we can discuss properly.