Thoughts about M4A1-S Update?

[Gavin]

I am here to talk ^-^

[Don Vito Corleone]

Morphine #BMTH lähetti viestin:

is m4a1-s really back to normal?

For me it is. Maybe for others it will have to wait. And I can confirm that I'm not just "adapting". The difference in the ROF alone is so high that it has nothing to do with adapting to the nerf. They silently removed it. For some regions it might take longer (which is a fail in itself for a competitive game when one side gets to use the good M4 and the other has a lower patch level and gets the bad M4). I will however play another DM to check if this is still the case.

[Low Poly]

Perfect update, it made the game much more fair and reasonable, only people who hate it are idiots that downgraded to windows X and people who sunk to much money into an m4a1s skin,

[Sandshark]

Alpropos lähetti viestin:

Mr. Figgles lähetti viestin:

Good riddance to the A1-s. I personally did use it from time-to-time but I honestly feel like the A1-S along with the USP should've never been added. I don't really see the point to it. It just adds balancing complications.

Uhm, USP has been part of cs since the game was invented......

So was the m4a1 with a silencer before they decided to split.

He means added to global offensive.
The M4A1 and USP weren't part of the base game.

[OMW2FYB]

Hey can someone help me csgo isnt working on my computer

[Leftbrain]

WTB CSS M4A1-S VOLVO!

[Morphine]

Abraxas Demian lähetti viestin:

Morphine #BMTH lähetti viestin:

is m4a1-s really back to normal?

For me it is. Maybe for others it will have to wait. And I can confirm that I'm not just "adapting". The difference in the ROF alone is so high that it has nothing to do with adapting to the nerf. They silently removed it. For some regions it might take longer (which is a fail in itself for a competitive game when one side gets to use the good M4 and the other has a lower patch level and gets the bad M4). I will however play another DM to check if this is still the case.

hmm its really wierd, asked lots of people tho, everyone said it hasn't been unnurfed. I understand different region and ect. but its really wierd check again. Played DM and it shoots slow,, definitely not like before update

[Morphine]

Lord Beerus lähetti viestin:

Perfect update, it made the game much more fair and reasonable, only people who hate it are idiots that downgraded to windows X and people who sunk to much money into an m4a1s skin,

♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ lmao
this update made even more disbalance between T's and CT's rifles

[Morphine]

Lord Beerus lähetti viestin:

Perfect update, it made the game much more fair and reasonable, only people who hate it are idiots that downgraded to windows X and people who sunk to much money into an m4a1s skin,

calling people idiots for no reason makes you the biggest idiot here gz

[Jack]

Yeah they seem to have buffed the Barretta's, but the M4A1-S seems decent.

[Pokycaesar]

I find that the A1 nerfed was unfair since the only good thing about it was the silencer and and the accuracy. Now they've nerfed causing everyone who uses it to have to learn to use the A4.

[Mr. X]

My personal opinion would be that both weapons should be equally effective. They don't need to have an inbalance, just equal strength's and weaknesses. This update cleary upsets the balance for worse.

[Juan D. Tap]

recoil didnt get higher. idk why ppl keep saying that

[Low Poly]

Mr.X lähetti viestin:

My personal opinion would be that both weapons should be equally effective. They don't need to have an inbalance, just equal strength's and weaknesses. This update cleary upsets the balance for worse.

2900 vs 3100 - thats not even or fair ecomonics, their needs to be a balance and the m4a1s is even after the nerf, still the better weapon, idk why people are complaining, they simply havent used it yet.

[Don Vito Corleone]

After the mini-update that I installed I can definitely confirm that the M4A1-S is back to the previous state - except for the price, which is still 3100 instead of 3200. Before I installed this update the weapon was definitely worse than a ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ UMP-45. Now it acts basically like I am used to it. Maybe it will take time until this update is rolled out everywhere, but I can no longer complain about bad M4A1-S behaviour. However there still remain the questions: Who was allowed to make such a stupid decision? And why did nobody put him into the psychiatric ward where he can play around with Minecraft if he doesn't like CS?

[chows]

Lord Beerus lähetti viestin:

Mr.X lähetti viestin:

My personal opinion would be that both weapons should be equally effective. They don't need to have an inbalance, just equal strength's and weaknesses. This update cleary upsets the balance for worse.

2900 vs 3100 - thats not even or fair ecomonics, their needs to be a balance and the m4a1s is even after the nerf, still the better weapon, idk why people are complaining, they simply havent used it yet.

Im sure it really nerfed a lot because of the ROF.
now S is feel like a rapid one tap when spray. Its really bad.