1024x768 or 800x600 for fps

[Hazenga]

Basically, what gives more fps? I got a 144hz monitor, have an average of 200fps both, haven't looked more into it. 1920x1080 gives me average of 140fps so..

[Gridlock]

Lower the resolution, more fps. You generally want to keep it at native resolution though.

[Hazenga]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Gridlock:

Lower the resolution, more fps. You generally want to keep it at native resolution though.

Well I need 144 fps minimum because I have a 144hz monitor, so an average of 140-200fps is not enough I guess.

[Omgwtfbbqkitten]

I used 640x480 in CS 1.6 for years. When CSGO came out I started playing on 800x600.

After a while I switched to 1024x768.

If you still get over 150 FPS on 1024x768 stretched I would use that. It is a little easier to see things at long range and it is a little easier to target people as the pixels look sharper.

1280x960 stretched could be an option too if you still get over 150 FPS.

[Hazenga]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Omgwtfbbqkitten:

I used 640x480 in CS 1.6 for years. When CSGO came out I started playing on 800x600.

After a while I switched to 1024x768.

If you still get over 150 FPS on 1024x768 stretched I would use that. It is a little easier to see things at long range and it is a little easier to target people as the pixels look sharper.

1280x960 stretched could be an option too if you still get over 150 FPS.

Nah I use black-bars, stretched is so bad imo, enemies move too fast horizontally, because pixels are stretched etc.

[Kitai]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Hazenga:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Gridlock:

Lower the resolution, more fps. You generally want to keep it at native resolution though.

Well I need 144 fps minimum because I have a 144hz monitor, so an average of 140-200fps is not enough I guess.

wait thats ret*rded 140 to 200 fps is good just play native with fps_max 144 on but 1024x768 is a alright res but stuff will look blurry if youre not used to it

[Accented]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von xMario126x:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Hazenga:

Well I need 144 fps minimum because I have a 144hz monitor, so an average of 140-200fps is not enough I guess.

wait thats ret*rded 140 to 200 fps is good just play native with fps_max 144 on but 1024x768 is a alright res but stuff will look blurry if youre not used to it

The more FPS, the smoother the input feels.

[alphax ツ]

Why would you want to play on a smaller screen when you can utilize all of the screen?

[Accented]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Frozen Pizza:

Why would you want to play on a smaller screen when you can utilize all of the screen?

For greater FPS.

[Yablonya]

Why do you want to play at such fps? After 60 fps your eye canno't notice any difference

[Hazenga]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Headshooter Bada$$:

Why do you want to play at such fps? After 60 fps your eye canno't notice any difference

Don't know if troll or not :D But if not then go look in youtube CS:GO 60hz vs 144hz

[Hazenga]

So still 800x600 gives more fps or is it the same as 1024x768?

[Tapdatgoat]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Accented:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von xMario126x:

wait thats ret*rded 140 to 200 fps is good just play native with fps_max 144 on but 1024x768 is a alright res but stuff will look blurry if youre not used to it

The more FPS, the smoother the input feels.

The difference isn't considerable enough to say "140-200 isn't enough".
I'd take full hd with 200 fps over 800x600 with 300 any day.

[Hazenga]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Tapdatgoat:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Accented:

The more FPS, the smoother the input feels.

The difference isn't considerable enough to say "140-200 isn't enough".
I'd take full hd with 200 fps over 800x600 with 300 any day.

Fenkz you

[Asuterisuku]

But the whole 'models are bigger' thing is a placebo effect... Especially if you're letterboxed. Why would you cut off your FOV like that?

[قف]

5600 x 3200 retina 4k