Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
300+ fps https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2YIUrTFzfBI
Motherboard has very little to do in here. 12400F is not going to draw crazy amounts of power whereas high end VRM would be needed. 12400F is rated for ~120W. Usually even entry level motherboards are quite capable to deliver juice for higher end CPUs such as 13900 or 14900. Games as workloads are not going to draw much power anyways - at least not CS2. You'll be averaging around 100-150W @ CS2 with a CPU capable of drawing as much as 250-300W, like said 13900 or 14900. This leaves plenty of headroom for even entry level VRMs.
Aaand storage speed does not affect framerate directly. At least not in CS2. Running something like Stalker 2 @ 4K could be a different story but you can run this game on HDD. It could cause frametime spikes though. And of course loading times would be abysmal.
12400F+4060 is enough for CS2. You'll get plenty of frames per second.
Game's busted.