Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I wonder instead of which map Cache will be added to Premier... I, as the self-proclaimed ambassador of low-end PC players, hope that it will replace Anubis. xD
But Anubis works great on low end PC's. Inferno and Ancient are prolly the worst to play on crappy setups.
the only place where I struggle on Ancient is T spawn when everybody is running in the water, I get 40 fps there, but once out of spawn - everything is back to normal. I had MUUCH worse performance on Ancient back in CS:GO.
huge CPU bottleneck here by the way (and ram, DDR3 @ 1333 MHz)
Mirage is so overplayed and I have no idea why. It's always been a terrible map even when it was called cpl_strike in CS 1.6.
"Dust II got stuck? Oh well, might keep it if it doesnt hurt"
Then the moment it gets voted in on premier.
"Ow, damnit it's the Dust II giving me pain... again."
saying that a map is bad isn't valid criticism
Well yes, there are objectively bad maps. Maps which are very one-sided, maps which have performance issues as well as maps which have a poor colour pallet meaning some agents blend into the background.
Those are genuine reasons to label a map bad.