CS2 Anticheat…

[KREEPAR123]

I think you know that Faceit has a good anticheat. So, why Valve can’t just buy it and turn on? (Turn on not for 2 hours) WHY?!

[akiuara]

VAC is doing fine, no need to replace it.

[Fish]

Kernel level anti-cheat that is loaded at boot, it is very invasive and I as well as many other privacy minded players feel uncomfortable installing it. Valve is trying to do an anti-cheat that isn't as invasive (still a bit to invasive in my opinion) in comparison with their competitors.

[KREEPAR123]

Originally posted by Fish:

Kernel level anti-cheat that is loaded at boot, it is very invasive and I as well as many other privacy minded players feel uncomfortable installing it. Valve is trying to do an anti-cheat that isn't as invasive (still a bit to invasive in my opinion) in comparison with their competitors.

Oh, I was feeling uncomfortable too when I was installing faceit anticheat, but it’s better than play with lots of cheaters.

[KREEPAR123]

Originally posted by akiuara:

VAC is doing fine, no need to replace it.:Thumb_up:

VAC - Valve Allow Cheaters

[akiuara]

Originally posted by ✪ KREEPAR123:

Originally posted by akiuara:

VAC is doing fine, no need to replace it.

VAC - Valve Allow Cheaters

That is not true at all, VAC stands for "Valve Anti Cheat"

[Simen]

full wall hack in premier.

[KingpinX]

Originally posted by Fish:

Kernel level anti-cheat that is loaded at boot, it is very invasive and I as well as many other privacy minded players feel uncomfortable installing it. Valve is trying to do an anti-cheat that isn't as invasive (still a bit to invasive in my opinion) in comparison with their competitors.

this is why CHEATERS are scared of kernel level anti cheat. ive never meet a LEGIT player care about a kernel level as long as it actually worked!....now on the other hand u have cheaters screaming no because it invades there privacy on the computer. simply dont play then. matter fact valve charge 100$ for cs 2 prime...free version only for deathmatch not even casual or anything else just deathmatch + if u get caught cheating you lose the whole account, every game, every skin, everything on the account, locked out.

[DuFFy Duck]

Originally posted by tsumaki:

VAC is doing fine, no need to replace it.:Thumb_up:

VAC is

[akiuara]

Originally posted by DuFFy Duck:

Originally posted by tsumaki:

VAC is doing fine, no need to replace it.

VAC is :♥♥♥♥:

VAC is good and

[akiuara]

Originally posted by KingpinX:

Originally posted by Fish:

Kernel level anti-cheat that is loaded at boot, it is very invasive and I as well as many other privacy minded players feel uncomfortable installing it. Valve is trying to do an anti-cheat that isn't as invasive (still a bit to invasive in my opinion) in comparison with their competitors.

this is why CHEATERS are scared of kernel level anti cheat. ive never meet a LEGIT player care about a kernel level as long as it actually worked!....now on the other hand u have cheaters screaming no because it invades there privacy on the computer. simply dont play then. matter fact valve charge 100$ for cs 2 prime...free version only for deathmatch not even casual or anything else just deathmatch + if u get caught cheating you lose the whole account, every game, every skin, everything on the account, locked out.

We are not scared of it, we are just simply scared that our privacy is at stake, that is why VAC is a very good anticheat, it protect us players from cheaters, it doesn't invade our privacy, best anticheat.

[UNKNOWN]

Originally posted by DuFFy Duck:

Originally posted by tsumaki:

VAC is doing fine, no need to replace it.:Thumb_up:

VAC is

No, VAC is great

[akiuara]

Originally posted by create joy:

Originally posted by DuFFy Duck:

VAC is :♥♥♥♥:

No, VAC is great

I agree with you bro.

[kabanod1m #NotoToxicity]

I'm pretty sure if faceit anticheat, or hell, any anticheat in the world gets implemented into CS2, we'll have public bypasses written in python everywhere in a matter of weeks for it…

Remember we were looking up to BattlEye? Well look at PUBG and Tarkov.
Easy Anti-Cheat? After it was implemented on ZenGaming (CSGO website that was giving away skins for winning on their platform), it took 3 days for cheaters to return with spinbots. And it wasn't even that popular.

I believe that all it takes to get around an anti-cheat is a truly competitive game where mentally weak people would want to cheat in.

[Jo_Mei]

Originally posted by kabanod1m:

I'm pretty sure if faceit anticheat, or hell, any anticheat in the world gets implemented into CS2, we'll have public bypasses written in python everywhere in a matter of weeks for it…

Remember we were looking up to BattlEye? Well look at PUBG and Tarkov.
Easy Anti-Cheat? After it was implemented on ZenGaming (CSGO website that was giving away skins for winning on their platform), it took 3 days for cheaters to return with spinbots. And it wasn't even that popular.

I believe that all it takes to get around an anti-cheat is a truly competitive game where mentally weak people would want to cheat in.

isnt EAC using kernel ?

[WakiMiko]

Originally posted by tsumaki:

VAC is doing fine, no need to replace it.:Thumb_up:

You are delusional