Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Matchmaking in CS2 is fu cked up because of map-based ranking, wich is really siht.
So Cs2 covers up its bad matchmaking due not showing ranks to players.
When Valve will use gamedesigners again, who play themselves the game?
the game already reveals the rank at the begginning of the game but of course nobody checked it
you guys kept kicking people due to their ranks so they hid it. Stop crying so much over such a minor thing. Knowing your teammates rank does nothing anyways
This is clearly covering up badly balanced matchmaking, wich is based on maps.
Cs2 is worse then CS becuase poor game design - badly chosed game mechanics.
- Similar to mechanics "not enough money" instead of bots, when team player leaves, and after 2 rounds, and again - after side swap, after 2 rounds - it just mocking and creates frustration, instead of balancing the game.
- But when designers 1) put bad mechanics in game and 2) do not listen to actual players feedback, it shows designers do not play actually the game. Its also shows that Valve has new designers on game, who do not care about game or players who plays this game.