Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I don't get any cheaters in my high Trust Factor games.
Consider improving your Trust Factor.
If you're already in the high Trust Factor, then it's likely the enemy was just better.
If you get blatant cheaters, then it's a sign your Trust Factor might not be as good as you assume.
Are you saying that the anti cheat system is working?
ths bthces plss ♥♥♥♥♥
vanguard is no better than VAC, what reduces the amount of cheaters is not the anti-cheat, but active moderators / admins who search for cheats and test them, then report back to devs directly.
lot of smaller companies are doing this, but valve only counts money, they don't count how many cheaters their game has. why should they? they're not losing any money cuz of cheaters, it's other way around, occasionally cheaters DO get banned and then they re-buy = profit for valve.
bottom line:
no matter how good anti-cheat is, there's ALWAYS a way to bypass it and make UNDETECTABLE cheats. devs simply need to hire a team dedicated on finding undetectable cheats and sending them to devs. aka direct blacklisting.