CS2 Score based on damage?

[Nuke Man]

Dumb, The first counter-strike in 1999 way better.

[Drax]

Originally posted by 1 Bullet:

so first hes not right at all there is no objective information to even deduce such a claim, second my rank is not reflective since im not boasting about the pros and calling people dumb and etc. Finally pre 2016 ranks were flat and not bell curve so max ranks were erased. its laughable that you would somehow assume that noone else could use the same site i do. Not to mention 90% of my matches are single que, i dont need to have someone que with me every match, cause you know...other things in life.

sigh*... In tough games where skill levels are equal, equipment is often the deciding factor. You want to maximise your chances of winning a round, any round, to regain your economy which means saving up for the best odds to prevent a losing streak. It's not that complicated. You also NEED utility. Buying a mac-10 every round and armour just doesn't cut it when people are good at the game. Flashes, smokes, mollys, etc. are a necessity to taking and defending sites. Probably isn't necessary in silver or nova because the average player can't use rifles effectively anyway. But it's a good habit to learn. Sacrificing one round for the best odds is much better than poor odds three rounds in a row.

He never said he was a pro. You were the one that brought up player ranks here. Despite being, again, a silver. It doesn't matter what rank you were seven years ago if you're silver now. It also doesn't matter what site you or I use, it's just match statistics. And you don't have to worry about 'solo queuing' until you're at around MG2 or MGE. Whilst still very possible to carry even at that rank, that's how you put yourself in an early grave because you're dealing with people who, like you, are buying SMGs every round while the games are getting close.

Again, I wouldn't care if you hadn't brought ranks up yourself...but you did.

[Ælfwynn]

Originally posted by 1 Bullet:

Originally posted by Rain:

Of course, pro players buy AKs M4s AWPs then go eco if cant afford, that's how you win games, what do you wanna play with bizon and get 12 dmg per shot?, are you stupid or something?

little over the top response from a nova...

ironic considering you are peaking silver 4 for 1048 games

[skOsH♥]

I see that the ranks count for how much you helped your teammates. Not just ADR

[ピカチュウ]

I think Valve showed mercy not scoring based on attitude. I'd be glad seeing those people who disrespects and go toxic on teammates just because they are better, in a team game u work as a team u don't bark around

[moon]

Originally posted by Pizzashot:

I think it is good because attack damage per round or total damage is pretty much telling you if your teammate is doing anything at all. Some players have something like 120 damage in 12 rounds, they basically hit for 10 damage per round. I often looked at adr in CSGO and you could pretty much tell if you had any chance of winning after a couple of rounds by looking at the adr. You can not deal more damage than player health so the weapon you are using matters very little as long as you hit your shots.

nah honestly, i dont think it shows if they do anything or not, maybe my teammate is just wide swinging and peeking them, and they are lucky enough to survive, i think it tells way more by how many kills you have.