CS2 Score based on damage?

[Christmas Man]

Dumb, The first counter-strike in 1999 way better.

[Pizzashot]

I think it is good because attack damage per round or total damage is pretty much telling you if your teammate is doing anything at all. Some players have something like 120 damage in 12 rounds, they basically hit for 10 damage per round. I often looked at adr in CSGO and you could pretty much tell if you had any chance of winning after a couple of rounds by looking at the adr. You can not deal more damage than player health so the weapon you are using matters very little as long as you hit your shots.

[Christmas Man]

so people will only buy high dmg gun like aks this is dumb

[Severide]

Originally posted by Silver_SIr:

so people will only buy high dmg gun like aks this is dumb

Of course, pro players buy AKs M4s AWPs then go eco if cant afford, that's how you win games, what do you wanna play with bizon and get 12 dmg per shot?, are you stupid or something?

[ITSismaHQ]

dad

[Maxwell Boltzman Graph]

Yea a total score makes more sense. Just damage alone is lacking. I will see it shown me exactly how much ive been baited. ive got a few matches where I have almost 2x the damage given and only half the kills.

[🔥Emperor Pyromancer🔥]

Originally posted by Rain:

Originally posted by Silver_SIr:

so people will only buy high dmg gun like aks this is dumb

Of course, pro players buy AKs M4s AWPs then go eco if cant afford, that's how you win games, what do you wanna play with bizon and get 12 dmg per shot?, are you stupid or something?

to be honest i'm not much fan of eco but depends, i'd prefer a eco armed i think its still better.

[Maxwell Boltzman Graph]

Originally posted by Rain:

Originally posted by Silver_SIr:

so people will only buy high dmg gun like aks this is dumb

Of course, pro players buy AKs M4s AWPs then go eco if cant afford, that's how you win games, what do you wanna play with bizon and get 12 dmg per shot?, are you stupid or something?

little over the top response from a nova...

[Drax]

Originally posted by 🔥Emperor Pyromancer🔥:

Originally posted by Rain:

Of course, pro players buy AKs M4s AWPs then go eco if cant afford, that's how you win games, what do you wanna play with bizon and get 12 dmg per shot?, are you stupid or something?

to be honest i'm not much fan of eco but depends, i'd prefer a eco armed i think its still better.

There's a reason why your max rank is Nova 3. It's not up for debate, or a playstyle difference. If you're buying stupid crap instead of ecoing you're dragging your team down.

Rule of thumb, on any eco round have at least 2k spare. Second rule, if you have enough money to buy armor and an SMG you're usually better dropping pistols for the team, then utility, then armour. Dropping p250s and rushing mid with nades has won me plenty of ecos. Only buy SMGs if your team is full buying, you have a specific plan in mind, or you have like 8k.

If your entire team agrees to a force then go ahead. But that usually means its either second round, last round, or you have a hefty loss bonus.

Originally posted by 1 Bullet:

little over the top response from a nova...

But he's completely right. And csgostats says you were a silver 4 after 597 comp wins so bringing up ranks is probably not smart.

[🔥Emperor Pyromancer🔥]

Originally posted by Drax:

Originally posted by 🔥Emperor Pyromancer🔥:

to be honest i'm not much fan of eco but depends, i'd prefer a eco armed i think its still better.

There's a reason why your max rank is Nova 3. It's not up for debate, or a playstyle difference. If you're buying stupid crap instead of ecoing you're dragging your team down.

Rule of thumb, on any eco round have at least 2k spare. Second rule, if you have enough money to buy armor and an SMG you're usually better dropping pistols for the team, then utility, then armour. Dropping p250s and rushing mid with nades has won me plenty of ecos. Only buy SMGs if your team is full buying, you have a specific plan in mind, or you have like 8k.

If your entire team agrees to a force then go ahead. But that usually means its either second round, last round, or you have a hefty loss bonus.

Originally posted by 1 Bullet:

little over the top response from a nova...

But he's completely right. And csgostats says you were a silver 4 after 597 comp wins so bringing up ranks is probably not smart.

Well on past i have been better back in 2016-2017, but i dont understand why cs stats dont show me that my max rank was nova master (nova 4), i was going to ak but then i stop playing competitive and dont remember why but pretty much if i continue playing well with my team i can have going even to global who knows? you need understand cs go ranks dont means nothing, those are even globals who plays bad, i already met a lot of silvers and nova who playes very well but of course it's not big deal though.

[beanflavored]

this bait actually worked cuz a ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ ♥♥♥♥♥♥ made it

[🔥Emperor Pyromancer🔥]

@Drax other fact is if my team agree in go full eco then i just buy five-seven with vest + helmet and possible kit defuse, i do understand what's really eco but its hard to play with pistols when other side is heavily armed, that's why i'm not fan of it but as i mean just depends of situation, if side is heavily armed but the guys are kinda noobs then i think its not so hard to won against they just using pistols, i think also depends if both you and your team are great in pistols and know how to deal with this then it's won easy, on past i already won several pistol rounds as well for armed rounds, it just depends how to play and as well mood for exemple.

[Maxwell Boltzman Graph]

Originally posted by Drax:

Originally posted by 🔥Emperor Pyromancer🔥:

to be honest i'm not much fan of eco but depends, i'd prefer a eco armed i think its still better.

There's a reason why your max rank is Nova 3. It's not up for debate, or a playstyle difference. If you're buying stupid crap instead of ecoing you're dragging your team down.

Rule of thumb, on any eco round have at least 2k spare. Second rule, if you have enough money to buy armor and an SMG you're usually better dropping pistols for the team, then utility, then armour. Dropping p250s and rushing mid with nades has won me plenty of ecos. Only buy SMGs if your team is full buying, you have a specific plan in mind, or you have like 8k.

If your entire team agrees to a force then go ahead. But that usually means its either second round, last round, or you have a hefty loss bonus.

Originally posted by 1 Bullet:

little over the top response from a nova...

But he's completely right. And csgostats says you were a silver 4 after 597 comp wins so bringing up ranks is probably not smart.

so first hes not right at all there is no objective information to even deduce such a claim, second my rank is not reflective since im not boasting about the pros and calling people dumb and etc. Finally pre 2016 ranks were flat and not bell curve so max ranks were erased. its laughable that you would somehow assume that noone else could use the same site i do. Not to mention 90% of my matches are single que, i dont need to have someone que with me every match, cause you know...other things in life.

[choomah töm.]

Originally posted by 🔥Emperor Pyromancer🔥:

Originally posted by Drax:

There's a reason why your max rank is Nova 3. It's not up for debate, or a playstyle difference. If you're buying stupid crap instead of ecoing you're dragging your team down.

Rule of thumb, on any eco round have at least 2k spare. Second rule, if you have enough money to buy armor and an SMG you're usually better dropping pistols for the team, then utility, then armour. Dropping p250s and rushing mid with nades has won me plenty of ecos. Only buy SMGs if your team is full buying, you have a specific plan in mind, or you have like 8k.

If your entire team agrees to a force then go ahead. But that usually means its either second round, last round, or you have a hefty loss bonus.


But he's completely right. And csgostats says you were a silver 4 after 597 comp wins so bringing up ranks is probably not smart.

Well on past i have been better back in 2016-2017, but i dont understand why cs stats dont show me that my max rank was nova master (nova 4), i was going to ak but then i stop playing competitive and dont remember why but pretty much if i continue playing well with my team i can have going even to global who knows? you need understand cs go ranks dont means nothing, those are even globals who plays bad, i already met a lot of silvers and nova who playes very well but of course it's not big deal though.

rank means nothing

Originally posted by 1 Bullet:

Originally posted by Drax:

There's a reason why your max rank is Nova 3. It's not up for debate, or a playstyle difference. If you're buying stupid crap instead of ecoing you're dragging your team down.

Rule of thumb, on any eco round have at least 2k spare. Second rule, if you have enough money to buy armor and an SMG you're usually better dropping pistols for the team, then utility, then armour. Dropping p250s and rushing mid with nades has won me plenty of ecos. Only buy SMGs if your team is full buying, you have a specific plan in mind, or you have like 8k.

If your entire team agrees to a force then go ahead. But that usually means its either second round, last round, or you have a hefty loss bonus.


But he's completely right. And csgostats says you were a silver 4 after 597 comp wins so bringing up ranks is probably not smart.

so first hes not right at all there is no objective information to even deduce such a claim, second my rank is not reflective since im not boasting about the pros and calling people dumb and etc. Finally pre 2016 ranks were flat and not bell curve so max ranks were erased. its laughable that you would somehow assume that noone else could use the same site i do.

rank is not reflective of anything

[🔥Emperor Pyromancer🔥]

Btw i got confused with last answer from Drax that were to 1 bullet. lmao but i got it.

[🔥Emperor Pyromancer🔥]

Originally posted by töm.:

Originally posted by 🔥Emperor Pyromancer🔥:

Well on past i have been better back in 2016-2017, but i dont understand why cs stats dont show me that my max rank was nova master (nova 4), i was going to ak but then i stop playing competitive and dont remember why but pretty much if i continue playing well with my team i can have going even to global who knows? you need understand cs go ranks dont means nothing, those are even globals who plays bad, i already met a lot of silvers and nova who playes very well but of course it's not big deal though.

rank means nothing :captainclown:

Originally posted by 1 Bullet:

so first hes not right at all there is no objective information to even deduce such a claim, second my rank is not reflective since im not boasting about the pros and calling people dumb and etc. Finally pre 2016 ranks were flat and not bell curve so max ranks were erased. its laughable that you would somehow assume that noone else could use the same site i do.

rank is not reflective of anything :captainclown: :captainclown: :captainclown:

i agree with you but in other case the ranks from MM isn't efficient anymore, faceit level 10 is really very good and FPL Circuit is the best, that's it.