Played over 3,000 hours, but no more after csgo2

[绿茶 | Green Tea]

After the forceful upgrade, my laptop cannot handle CSGO 2 anymore. I have played CSGO for over 3000 hours. I don't understand why CSGO 2 to replace CSGO. Not reasonable and feel very bad.

[Fish]

Originally posted by Sunday Driver:

Why would someone HAVE to buy a new PC just to play a game they were literally playing a week ago? It's not like someone's talking about wanting to even play a new game that's different. They want to play the same game they have enjoyed for years, same as people who still play 1.6 or CS Source or L4D2.

I don't get why all these trolls come out blaming someone for wanting to enjoy CSGO as if it was somehow their fault something was done to them without them wanting it and the game they liked was taken from their account (something unheard of on Steam normally in 20 years of operation).

Lot of weird hostile simps for brands or something trying to attack OP and those with the same concerns. I can run this game maxed no problems, doesn't mean I don't have sympathy for those who can't now or that I am not annoyed at the game PAID FOR being taken away from me instead of it being given its own Steam Store page just like CSGO got when it was the new thing after CS Source (which still has its own store page!).

This is exactly the point that the shills love to ignore, this would be like if valve released CSS and then basically blocked all ability to play 1.6 forever.

[ThorN]

I agree with the above, but, and I don't want to shill, but selecting the demo viewer from the beta tab downloads the whole of CS:GO to your PC and you can play that. Community servers as well as LAN and offline play is still there

[Sunday Driver]

Originally posted by Rosen:

This is exactly the point that the shills love to ignore, this would be like if valve released CSS and then basically blocked all ability to play 1.6 forever.

From what I've seen commented here it seems to have been done as pure greed to force people into their new future hardcore MTX structure. They must have been really hungry to rush it out the door when it wasn't finished baking.

This is why "CS2" became a skin walking parasite that stole CSGO's store page. It stole the page, stole the valor of CSGO's reviews and stats, stole our hard won achievements and then deleted them!

What's the point of achievements on Steam AT ALL if they just steal them from us? Especially as it was done out of pure greed to use the CSGO steam store page to FORCE it on to everyone instead of offering a superior product if you can and letting people choose it, as they did with CSGO when CS Source was being replaced the honest way.

[Labyrinth2 0]

I actually made a guide on how you can still play CS:GO, check it out:

https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3042931658

[Fish]

Originally posted by Sunday Driver:

Originally posted by Rosen:

This is exactly the point that the shills love to ignore, this would be like if valve released CSS and then basically blocked all ability to play 1.6 forever.

From what I've seen commented here it seems to have been done as pure greed to force people into their new future hardcore MTX structure. They must have been really hungry to rush it out the door when it wasn't finished baking.

This is why "CS2" became a skin walking parasite that stole CSGO's store page. It stole the page, stole the valor of CSGO's reviews and stats, stole our hard won achievements and then deleted them!

What's the point of achievements on Steam AT ALL if they just steal them from us? Especially as it was done out of pure greed to use the CSGO steam store page to FORCE it on to everyone instead of offering a superior product if you can and letting people choose it, as they did with CSGO when CS Source was being replaced the honest way.

I can't even get into a match on CS2 due to some weird bug I can't figure out how to fix where it says I can't connect to the servers hahahaha

[B1gD4ddy]

Originally posted by Rosen:

Originally posted by B1gD4ddy:

this game is not hard to run at all.
even a gtx 1060, a garbage card from over 7 years ago that was already garbage when it released said over 7 years ago, achieves 105fps at 1080p max settings(!) in cs2.
at 1440p max settings(!) it still achieves 70fps.
you are the problem.
not cs2.
cs2 has a very good performance/graphics ratio.

The 1060 was a fantastic card, but I will never buy from Nvidia ever again.

🤡🤡🤡

[Hamsterpeek]

Originally posted by B1gD4ddy:

this game is not hard to run at all.
even a gtx 1060, a garbage card from over 7 years ago that was already garbage when it released said over 7 years ago, achieves 105fps at 1080p max settings(!) in cs2.
at 1440p max settings(!) it still achieves 70fps.
you are the problem.
not cs2.
cs2 has a very good performance/graphics ratio.

The GTX 1060 6 GB variant actually was one of the best price/performance cards back then especially on the Nvidia side of things and even today it is. You can buy them used for so cheap.

Other than that you're right that even that GPU nowadays can run CS2 just fine. 105 fps on 1080p is fine considering that most play 4:3 1280x960 which probably boosts the fps to roughly 150.

I actually have a Gigabyte GTX 1060 6GB in my second gaming PC and should do some more testing with it. I bet I could even get more FPS than 150 with it.

[AHRI ENJOYER]

Funny

[B1gD4ddy]

Originally posted by Hamsterpeek:

Originally posted by B1gD4ddy:

this game is not hard to run at all.
even a gtx 1060, a garbage card from over 7 years ago that was already garbage when it released said over 7 years ago, achieves 105fps at 1080p max settings(!) in cs2.
at 1440p max settings(!) it still achieves 70fps.
you are the problem.
not cs2.
cs2 has a very good performance/graphics ratio.

The GTX 1060 6 GB variant actually was one of the best price/performance cards back then especially on the Nvidia side of things and even today it is. You can buy them used for so cheap.

Other than that you're right that even that GPU nowadays can run CS2 just fine. 105 fps on 1080p is fine considering that most play 4:3 1280x960 which probably boosts the fps to roughly 150.

I actually have a Gigabyte GTX 1060 6GB in my second gaming PC and should do some more testing with it. I bet I could even get more FPS than 150 with it.

i'm talking from the standpoint of an enthusiast.
my 4090oc often times disappoints me, so you can guess what i think about lowest end garbage like the gtx 1060.
i acknowledge though that it's all what casuals need to have fun.
nothing wrong there.
but when this thing achieves 105fps at 1080p max settings it's obvious it's not cs2's fault that those clowns can't play it.

[ℜᵒᵒSteR]

Originally posted by Ramesh:

Originally posted by ♿ Old Man WWGOA ♿ Rooster:

i have over 7700 hours last i looked and now i dont have csgo anymore...i actually paid cash money for csgo and they decided for me to replace it with a completely different game...i mean you went to a Mercedes dealer and bought Mercedes-Benz 300 SLR Uhlenhaut Coupe and they give you a Volkswagen Tiguan to drive off the lot!!!

No. It´s like buying a Mercedes in 2012 and getting a brand new car without any additional payment 11 years later. It´s no Mercedes anymore, but it´s more efficient and higher built quality. - So when you´re trying to compare, make sure the comparison doesn´t lack that much.

you are totally off the mark....despite when the game came out the comparison is because i paid for csgo and Valve decided to replace a game i paid for with a different game...i would never have paid for cs2 and just 2 days in every single game i have played is littered with blatant cheaters. next time you try to show how smart you are make sure you actually understand what you read before you post stupid sh..

[FEIN.]

CSGO 2 is ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ ..

[Hamsterpeek]

Originally posted by B1gD4ddy:

Originally posted by Hamsterpeek:

The GTX 1060 6 GB variant actually was one of the best price/performance cards back then especially on the Nvidia side of things and even today it is. You can buy them used for so cheap.

Other than that you're right that even that GPU nowadays can run CS2 just fine. 105 fps on 1080p is fine considering that most play 4:3 1280x960 which probably boosts the fps to roughly 150.

I actually have a Gigabyte GTX 1060 6GB in my second gaming PC and should do some more testing with it. I bet I could even get more FPS than 150 with it.

i'm talking from the standpoint of an enthusiast.
my 4090oc often times disappoints me, so you can guess what i think about lowest end garbage like the gtx 1060.
i acknowledge though that it's all what casuals need to have fun.
nothing wrong there.
but when this thing achieves 105fps at 1080p max settings it's obvious it's not cs2's fault that those clowns can't play it.

Well I'm an enthusiast my self but don't have that peak performance but rather am spread wide in terms of hardware. My best pc has a 2070super and i7 9700k and for 1080p gaming with 144fps/hz in any game and moviemaking, nothing better is required. Second is i5 9600k with 1060 6gb, third i5 4590k with 1050ti etc. - I could buy the best pc without issues but it's moneywaste.

I also have 10+ PCs and as many laptops, some from before 2000 and then going up til now. I like to bench with them and keep them alive and they're great memories from the past. Those are most PCs/Laptops I bought new back then - and I got aole for free - and sell some from tile to time. My oldest PC is from 1995 and oldest laptop from 1998.

B2t: You're rightm It is clearly not vaoves fault. People just spend their money in wrong ways over a decade long period and then wokder why their office PC from 10+ years ago doesn't run CS.

[B1gD4ddy]

yeah, it always depends on what you are playing and how you want to play.
if a 2070s is all you need to be happy at 1080p that's perfectly fine.
but that doesn't change the fact that there are many aaa games in which a 2070s at 1080p maxed out doesn't achieve more than a slideshow.
it's about expectations, money and what is important to you.
i for example am so thrilled for the 5090, because it will enable me to play aaa games from years ago the way i want it.
casuals will now say wtf are you talking about, because they don't understand anything and always only see themselves.
i personally play at native 4k with manually maxed out settings (and manually maxed out raytracing) and want at least 100fps for smooth enjoyable gameplay.
there are many aaa games, even from years ago, in which my 4090oc does not achieve that.
for example cyberpunk, ghost recon breakpoint, ghost recon wildlands etc.
while modern games give us dlss 2 quality, dlss 3 frame gen and dlss 3.5 ray reconstruction older aaa games don't have that.
this means i can't do anything against my 4090oc disappointing me.
btw i also love benching and overclocking.
i just finalized the oc on my 4090 and am currently working on the curve optimizer value for my 7950x3d.
after that i will start minimizing the ram timings.

[jeff陈]

Originally posted by 76561198088409502:

Originally posted by Hamsterpeek:

Even 10+ year old hardware can run CS2. If you can't run CS2 it means you didn't manage to save up ~100 euro in total in 10 years to buy a more performancy PC and instead of blaming yourself you blame a absolute reasonable and must-have change valve did.

All these threads ranting against CS2 are non constructive, non reasonable and just silly.

OK, my pc is full 2012, motherboard, cpu, ram
GPU is rx580 so 2017ish
i avg less then 60fps with lots of stutter on lowest ingame settings
prior to this it ran around 200-250fps ( if not higher )
i think its a very valid reason to demand better optimisation

bro I had rx 580 120 fps on 1280x960 on 16:9 I got around 100 I think its ur CPU maybe or something else

[⛧Vinn⛧]

Originally posted by jeff:

Originally posted by 76561198088409502:

OK, my pc is full 2012, motherboard, cpu, ram
GPU is rx580 so 2017ish
i avg less then 60fps with lots of stutter on lowest ingame settings
prior to this it ran around 200-250fps ( if not higher )
i think its a very valid reason to demand better optimisation

bro I had rx 580 120 fps on 1280x960 on 16:9 I got around 100 I think its ur CPU maybe or something else

You are responding to year old posts