Counter-Strike 2 worse than CS:GO and CS:S

[{SçM}TonyFetuccini_]

Much like CSGO wasn't nearly as good as CSS, I would imagine the same would go for CS2. Its going to be like CSS > GSGO >= CS2. Value really needs to go above and beyond with CS2 to top the CSS. There was a true level of real skill involved with CSS that we need to get back to in this community.

[Charge only]

If css is so good why more people playing csgo?

[𝐹𝓇𝑜𝑔𝑔𝓎✪]

Originally posted by TootsMcPoots_:

Much like CSGO wasn't nearly as good as CSS, I would imagine the same would go for CS2. Its going to be like CSS > GSGO >= CS2. Value really needs to go above and beyond with CS2 to top the CSS. There was a true level of real skill involved with CSS that we need to get back to in this community.

do you have cs2?

or just wild guess? id like to know from ppl who have it.

also how is cs2 hit reg?

[DAWN OF THE DEAD]

Originally posted by Yoda:

There is another

[XanDer-XTX]

As much as I like CS Source, CSGO is way better by a mile in terms of balanced gameplay, content, online play, loot boxes and so on.

Don't get me wrong, I really like the Counter-Strike franchise as a whole but saying CS Source is better than CSGO or CS2 is just wrong, objectively speaking.

For example, CS Source meta is the same 4 guns every round: AK/M4/AWP/Deagle, there's no reason to use the rest of the guns but the game is more casual oriented so there's a place for casuals (like myself) to enjoy.

On the other hand, CSGO made most of the guns viable depending of the scenarios you are in but there are a few exceptions like the M249, Sawed Off, R8 and Bizon. The aforementioned guns are straight up rubbish.

[NatzoXavier]

CS Source had too big head hit boxes making it too easy to get heads making it the least skillful CS.

[NatzoXavier]

Originally posted by XanDer-XTX:

As much as I like CS Source, CSGO is way better by a mile in terms of balanced gameplay, content, online play, loot boxes and so on.

Don't get me wrong, I really like the Counter-Strike franchise as a whole but saying CS Source is better than CSGO or CS2 is just wrong, objectively speaking.

For example, CS Source meta is the same 4 guns every round: AK/M4/AWP/Deagle, there's no reason to use the rest of the guns but the game is more casual oriented so there's a place for casuals (like myself) to enjoy.

On the other hand, CSGO made most of the guns viable depending of the scenarios you are in but there are a few exceptions like the M249, Sawed Off, R8 and Bizon. The aforementioned guns are straight up rubbish.

also this is a true gigachad response

[{SçM}TonyFetuccini_]

The developers always knew CSS was better than CSGO. Valve forced the developers to hop on the Call of Duty Band Wagon. I get people need to make money, but there is no originality in trying to copy COD. I am hoping CS2 is original and they aren't trying to make a COD clone again.

[rd cafeta]

omg heinkkkkkkkkk

[𝙩 𝙖 𝙤 ×͜ ×]

HOLA . FUI SELECCIONADO CON LA PRUEBA PARA CSGO2 .. ACTUALICE Y SALI PERO ESTA TODO IGUAL.. ALGUIEN ME PUEDE AYUDAR??

[あまってれ]

Originally posted by 󠁳⁧⁧eekuzo:

Originally posted by apoLLo:

If css is so good why more people playing csgo?

skins

True

[Трактор]

Жду не дождусь кс2

[Voll_lol]

♥♥♥

[adviser666]

хочу

[Трактор]

Кс по себе игра самая топовая всё остальное гавно

[Bruhja]

Originally posted by NatzoXavier:

CS Source had too big head hit boxes making it too easy to get heads making it the least skillful CS.

CS2 has made the head hitboxes up to 20% bigger depending on the skin