Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
In new cs in low looks like a potato.
I'd imagine even as something as old as a 660 could run it with tweaked settings.
Worst case, anyone with a older video card that was once decent will have to use something like FSR to help with GPU strain.
Ether way, I've seen videos of people using 1050s to play it and it was fine. Not sure how creditable the source was, but why would you lie about a benchmark?
That could be a huge performance gain for people.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUfacODhS1c
I have an old pc, have like 120-140fps on spawn and like 80 in battle in cs2. Its pretty much unplayable and feels like playing with a 150+ ping even on lowest settings possible and 2nd lowest resolution.
I'm saving for a new pc now.
btw, in normal cs go i have about 300fps in spawn and between 150 and 200fps in battle, also lowest settings.