Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
no thanks, I dont want to wait a gazillion minutes just to fight against a full lobby
However, you need solo queue to fill for a 4v5
tell me what the problem is when 5 people queue together? its perfect for communication and teamwork
i would actually support that, would be cool
Valve removed 4 man stacks because in a competitive mode where rank and elo matters, it would be unfair for the one remaining random, yet they are perfectly fine with 5 premades stomping on 5 randoms with little to no in-game chemistry or communication.
or... well.. i would welcome the challenge and fight against them in a solo queue, its experience after all, training
If Valve removed 4 man stacks, due to the competitive nature of the game, why allow 5 man stacks play against fragmented teams? Just inconsistent IMO.