Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
It never dissapointed me on Deathmatch - its magazine and reload time are great for DM
But they are good if you are out of €€€€€€. If you are doing headshots they get the job done
I never liked CZ-75. I feel like its just worse, but cheaper version of UMP. Five Seven does not cost much more, most times you always got even for Five Seven, not just P250. I feel like Five Seven is clear winner against P250, its got 1 headshot kill to the Armored Enemy, I remember same damage in generous, but Five Seven got larger magazine size, and its got armor piercing rounds.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2qzT8LgU4Q
Cz75 is bad. You cant save your ammo with it. If you dont spray, P250 is just an upgrade from it. If you do spray, you miss every 2. round and you cant fight very long with it.