I realise that the m4a4 is dominating in csgo's current meta. What WOULD U DO TO BUFF THE m4A1S

[DifferentiationPeek]

In my opinion I would allow both guns in the buy menu and lower the m4a1s by another 200 dollars. LET ME KNOW WHAT U WOULD DO. LETS KEEP THIS POST ALIVE

[DifferentiationPeek]

blaze님이 먼저 게시:

k0fe님이 먼저 게시:

Yes! And all other guns except AK, A4, AWP and Deagle

why would they remove guns out of the game?

Btw this is meant as ajoke

[DifferentiationPeek]

Stick to the topic gys

[DifferentiationPeek]

Anyway......Is it criminal to add m4a1s to the buy menu

[wrath]

not rly
i have m4a1-s equipped rn, its fine and good for comp. i think both weapons are fine the way they are rn :/

[MechARM_]

The reason both weapons are not available is that it would be unfair to the Ts which have no alternate rifle. Also the fire rate of the a1s is a big drawback. It is intended for long-mid range. Suppose you get in a fight with a T who has an AK in aps on inferno. You have the A1S. Both weapons have the same fire rate, but AK has more damage. You have no chance, unless the other person has really bad aim. While with the A4, the extra bullets you could shoot in the same time would make the fight skill oriented.

About s1mple using the A1-S, remember that he is not a rifler. He is a main AWPer who is used to holding long angles. And I agree, holding long distances with the a1s is way easier. I really don't think any Rifler uses the a1s at the moment.

I used to be an a1s person too, but I was losing a lot of fights just because I had a weapon useless at close range. A CZ75 is better than the a1s in close quarters.

Using the A1s means replacing the a4, which is not a really good option. You can always use the AUG if you want longer range and better damage

[1...2...aND 3!!!!!!!!!!!]

UWUCS.MONEY님이 먼저 게시:

In my opinion I would allow both guns in the buy menu and lower the m4a1s by another 200 dollars. LET ME KNOW WHAT U WOULD DO. LETS KEEP THIS POST ALIVE

Yes true,i tested m4a4 and m4a1s yesterday for like 20 minutes and m4a4-felt pretty less delayed powerfull with firerate 200$ worth it for me to keep using it.

[Anero]

P1XEL | Poggers님이 먼저 게시:

The reason both weapons are not available is that it would be unfair to the Ts which have no alternate rifle. Also the fire rate of the a1s is a big drawback. It is intended for long-mid range. Suppose you get in a fight with a T who has an AK in aps on inferno. You have the A1S. Both weapons have the same fire rate, but AK has more damage. You have no chance, unless the other person has really bad aim. While with the A4, the extra bullets you could shoot in the same time would make the fight skill oriented.

About s1mple using the A1-S, remember that he is not a rifler. He is a main AWPer who is used to holding long angles. And I agree, holding long distances with the a1s is way easier. I really don't think any Rifler uses the a1s at the moment.

I used to be an a1s person too, but I was losing a lot of fights just because I had a weapon useless at close range. A CZ75 is better than the a1s in close quarters.

Using the A1s means replacing the a4, which is not a really good option. You can always use the AUG if you want longer range and better damage

M4a1 isnt that much better on longer range actually. The diffrence in accuarcy is 0.10 (absolutely neglible) and the recovery time is the same

[Irene ❤]

If so many people wish they can chose between buying M4 or A1, why not make it happen with both on the menu? As a T we can get an opponent team of 5 A4 or 5 A1-s. None is stronger than the other. It is already balanced.

[MechARM_]

But the recoil is way easier to control when spraying at long range

[DifferentiationPeek]

P1XEL | Poggers님이 먼저 게시:

The reason both weapons are not available is that it would be unfair to the Ts which have no alternate rifle. Also the fire rate of the a1s is a big drawback. It is intended for long-mid range. Suppose you get in a fight with a T who has an AK in aps on inferno. You have the A1S. Both weapons have the same fire rate, but AK has more damage. You have no chance, unless the other person has really bad aim. While with the A4, the extra bullets you could shoot in the same time would make the fight skill oriented.

About s1mple using the A1-S, remember that he is not a rifler. He is a main AWPer who is used to holding long angles. And I agree, holding long distances with the a1s is way easier. I really don't think any Rifler uses the a1s at the moment.

I used to be an a1s person too, but I was losing a lot of fights just because I had a weapon useless at close range. A CZ75 is better than the a1s in close quarters.

Using the A1s means replacing the a4, which is not a really good option. You can always use the AUG if you want longer range and better damage

However,it would not change a thing by adding both to the buy menu as the ts rifles r already better

[aK]

little higher ROF and 30 bullet mag is all it needs

[tourist1945]

BUFF M4A1-S

[DifferentiationPeek]

I think add both to buy menu and reduce by 50 diallers for a1s

[Shiro♌]

UWUCS.MONEY님이 먼저 게시:

I think add both to buy menu and reduce by 50 diallers for a1s

No price reducement. That'd make it completely unfair.

There's a reason, it costs $ 2900, and even then I still think, it should cost $ 3000.

I'm not sure, but I think, Sig Sauer's price wasn't reduced after getting heavily nerfed, or was it?

[Matthias]

All these M4A1 players speaking about how badly the M1 needs a buff.. Why you play it then, when the M4 is better in your opinion?