60hz vs 144hz vs 240hz

[Sonic $ushiboys]

I was wondering if the difference of 144hz and 240hz has a huge gap in the human eyes like 60hz vs 144hz. I'm planning to buy 240hz, I just want to know if it's worth it for this type of game

[SirSanjiSlacks]

_Alpha님이 먼저 게시:

Imma state one fact , which works for my faceit lv10 friend . In dust 2 B door , if u r T side holding with awp .
On 60 hz , u hit 1/10 shots .
On 144 hz , u hit 5/10 shots.
On 240hz ,u hit 8/10 shots .
A veryyyyy slight advantage while quick peeking n thats it .
Even if it feels more fluid , u wouldn't be able to hit all those shots that u think u can . Ur reaction doesn't improve . Only display lag decreases by some mili seconds.

240 hz doesn't lead to 3 more hits.
Would love to see your testing procedure that allows this guy to consistently hit those shots at those rates every time.

Sounds like flawed testing by a non-pro player. 240 hz doesn't make that much difference. That's just deviation.

[🍭󠁳󠁳⁧⁧Lalahti]

SirSanjiSlacks님이 먼저 게시:

_Alpha님이 먼저 게시:

Imma state one fact , which works for my faceit lv10 friend . In dust 2 B door , if u r T side holding with awp .
On 60 hz , u hit 1/10 shots .
On 144 hz , u hit 5/10 shots.
On 240hz ,u hit 8/10 shots .
A veryyyyy slight advantage while quick peeking n thats it .
Even if it feels more fluid , u wouldn't be able to hit all those shots that u think u can . Ur reaction doesn't improve . Only display lag decreases by some mili seconds.

240 hz doesn't lead to 3 more hits.
Would love to see your testing procedure that allows this guy to consistently hit those shots at those rates every time.

Sounds like flawed testing by a non-pro player. 240 hz doesn't make that much difference. That's just deviation.

He forgot to mention there was a cat on the desk before the 240hz test

[Winter Leaf]

SirSanjiSlacks님이 먼저 게시:

_Alpha님이 먼저 게시:

Imma state one fact , which works for my faceit lv10 friend . In dust 2 B door , if u r T side holding with awp .
On 60 hz , u hit 1/10 shots .
On 144 hz , u hit 5/10 shots.
On 240hz ,u hit 8/10 shots .
A veryyyyy slight advantage while quick peeking n thats it .
Even if it feels more fluid , u wouldn't be able to hit all those shots that u think u can . Ur reaction doesn't improve . Only display lag decreases by some mili seconds.

240 hz doesn't lead to 3 more hits.
Would love to see your testing procedure that allows this guy to consistently hit those shots at those rates every time.

Sounds like flawed testing by a non-pro player. 240 hz doesn't make that much difference. That's just deviation.

Well it did to him . He is not pro tho , but EU top 500 via faceit elo .
Main thing is that u get to see things in a MORE fluid way . And that doors was an example where u get the idea . There is a similar video by Linus Tech Tips showcasing the same . And those r all tested via high grade equipmemts n pros r invited there . Eg. Shroud was there . Watch that if u dont trust strangers on steam.

[Winter Leaf]

Smokey님이 먼저 게시:

Watch these 2 videos
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tV8P6T5tTYs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OX31kZbAXsA&t=1s

Ps. and dont forget a drinking bottle LTT store :B1:

Exactly . Thanks for stating them

[Yarak Grande]

240 for sure

[SirSanjiSlacks]

_Alpha님이 먼저 게시:

SirSanjiSlacks님이 먼저 게시:

240 hz doesn't lead to 3 more hits.
Would love to see your testing procedure that allows this guy to consistently hit those shots at those rates every time.

Sounds like flawed testing by a non-pro player. 240 hz doesn't make that much difference. That's just deviation.

Well it did to him . He is not pro tho , but EU top 500 via faceit elo .
Main thing is that u get to see things in a MORE fluid way . And that doors was an example where u get the idea . There is a similar video by Linus Tech Tips showcasing the same . And those r all tested via high grade equipmemts n pros r invited there . Eg. Shroud was there . Watch that if u dont trust strangers on steam.

I watched the LTT video before, and obviously there is a reason that Pros use the best hardware--240 hz in this current climate. They can afford it and it's expected. That doesn't mean that some faceit guy can hit shots more often unless the guy mid is exactly replicating the same jump across mid each time.

It has to be a closed experiment for this to be relevant data--ie he has to know exactly when the guy is going to peek doors, and at what position it will occur each time.

This still doesn't help the human factor, and since your friend isn't a professional awper, their aim is probably not good enough to hit cross 8/10 times anyways, much less use that to justify someone paying 500$ or more for a 1ms 240hz monitor when its not required, least of all on 64 tick MM.

[SirSanjiSlacks]

_Alpha님이 먼저 게시:

Smokey님이 먼저 게시:

Watch these 2 videos
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tV8P6T5tTYs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OX31kZbAXsA&t=1s

Ps. and dont forget a drinking bottle LTT store :B1:

Exactly . Thanks for stating them

Also, their testing schema here in the LTT video is even flawed since they started on the worst resolution, then let people get accustomed to what is occuring, and then move up to high hz without going back down or staying at it for long enough to build up mid muscle memory.

Remember, these people testing are awful at CS:GO and hit 9/10 shots mid aside from the pros they have. Linus, his friend, and Paul are not fast at reacting (see Linus dropping stuff all the time or his other tests)

[Winter Leaf]

SirSanjiSlacks님이 먼저 게시:

_Alpha님이 먼저 게시:

Well it did to him . He is not pro tho , but EU top 500 via faceit elo .
Main thing is that u get to see things in a MORE fluid way . And that doors was an example where u get the idea . There is a similar video by Linus Tech Tips showcasing the same . And those r all tested via high grade equipmemts n pros r invited there . Eg. Shroud was there . Watch that if u dont trust strangers on steam.

I watched the LTT video before, and obviously there is a reason that Pros use the best hardware--240 hz in this current climate. They can afford it and it's expected. That doesn't mean that some faceit guy can hit shots more often unless the guy mid is exactly replicating the same jump across mid each time.

It has to be a closed experiment for this to be relevant data--ie he has to know exactly when the guy is going to peek doors, and at what position it will occur each time.

This still doesn't help the human factor, and since your friend isn't a professional awper, their aim is probably not good enough to hit cross 8/10 times anyways, much less use that to justify someone paying 500$ or more for a 1ms 240hz monitor when its not required, least of all on 64 tick MM.

I said that HE hit 8 out of 10 . Never said anyone else would do it everytime . But one thing is for SURE that u have better chances than that of lower hz . If u hit 1/10 on 144 . Then u will def get 2/10 on 240 .
Also some flicks r easier as u get more precise feedback of oppponents movement .
I have stated all the pros , I didn't say anyting about price coz ofc its expensive . Thats why earlier I said not worth the price IF u not a frequent high ranked player . Else its worth it .

[grogcito]

to feel the same "jump" from 60hz to 144hz , you would need to get a 360hz one. Of course you would feel it being much better, but not as much as going from 60 to 144.

[CadNav]

Dio님이 먼저 게시:

R3TR0님이 먼저 게시:

From asking my friends who own 240hz monitor's the difference is there but not that big, personally I'd just wait for 360hz monitors

360hz monitors are just too much haha. Our eyes are used to 60hz

no not this again
this old thing
"are eyes are used to 60 hz"
"the human eye can only see 24 frames"
yeah the more hz the better because there are more frames that are showing up on your screen

[Winter Leaf]

little kid on the internet님이 먼저 게시:

Dio님이 먼저 게시:

360hz monitors are just too much haha. Our eyes are used to 60hz

no not this again
this old thing
"are eyes are used to 60 hz"
"the human eye can only see 24 frames"
yeah the more hz the better because there are more frames that are showing up on your screen

YH thats true . These guys haven't even played on a 240h one I suppose . Just saying random stuff found on internet . U can obv feel the difference but 144 hz is still ideal tbh.

[☆ Zero]

144 is fine, but still 240 is better...
If you are playing just Csgo, and you are better player, it is worth it.

If you are casual player, 144Hz is enough... QHD+144Hz better.

[Diopside^]

Having more than 144Hz is more than absurd and show of delusion, I don't see any practical difference higher than 144Hz, but if some one see it, congratulations.

[poop]

I'm holding out for 1000hz.
1ms response time has been available for a while now. But what's the point if more than half are being dropped because it can't actually be drawn 1000 times per second?

1ms frames are possible to see, so bring it already! Quit teasing us with the baby steps already tech companies!

[Varsik]

144 hz best,going back to 60 Hz and you ll feel the Game blurry