get used to a high sensitivity

[borjahen]

Hi. Sorry bad english.

I confirm that a low sensitivity helped me to be more consistent and have a better aim, but I hate to move my arm a lot ... so I decided to use 360º / 45cm (around 2.7 / 400 DPI).

I guess it will be a placebo effect but when I'm "onfire" it seems better than a low sensitivity.

The problem is when I am not "onfire", the aim is very unstable.

The tracking with 2.7 sensitivity is very "pixelated" and I don't know if it's because of my mouse, the mousepad or because of carrying that sensitivity. (Logitech G203 + Steelseries Heavy Plus)

I understand that everyone is going to tell me to use a low sensitivity, and I accept it, I know it is better but as I said before, I prefer to use this even if I need 1 year to get used to it.

Another question, about tracking ... do you think it could be better if I use 1600 DPI / 360º sens instead of 400 DPI / 360º sens?

[borjahen]

bump

[SpongeBooz]

i use 1000 dpi and 2.8 sens and im fine and i can easily control spray, i used to have low sens back in 1.6 but time and the hardware change that im now confortable with my settings specially with 1000hz

[RugOp'81]

More dpi !!! ..more more more !

The higher your dpi the better !!


You like a eDPI of 1080 (400x2.7)

400x2,7 = 800x1,35 = 1600x0,675 etc etc etc.

I use 16000dpi x 0,08 sens = 1280 eDPI. Ultra smooth, super accurate !