安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Admins where able to project a model inside a wall to see if the suspect was distracted by/aiming at the projection. This was obviously not automated.
I like the idea of the TS to add "aimbot-decoys", should be possible to implement and probably ez to update when the cheats are progressing.
I believe in human behaviors. If there are HvH game modes, or other handicap modes to support weaker players and better reward the skillful players, players will no longer need a reason to download those "program enhancers". Many are simply not a gamer but they wish to experience the fruits instead of paying to be a punching bag.
i dont see how this will detect wall hackers, and innocent people can be abnned if they accidently shoot one of theses invisible bots?
vac, vacnet, OW, trust. the combenation works well.
If adding a few more bots and stuff will slow your computer down to a point where you are worried about performance. I would worry about getting an upgrade. In Comp its 10 players and in DM it 20 players. I don't think it would be a problem
ButI do like the idea of it. This will also help overwatch as well and even the bots can gather info of how many times they have been hit by a player and it goes to valve to tweek their Vacnet.