Instal Steam
login
|
bahasa
简体中文 (Tionghoa Sederhana)
繁體中文 (Tionghoa Tradisional)
日本語 (Bahasa Jepang)
한국어 (Bahasa Korea)
ไทย (Bahasa Thai)
Български (Bahasa Bulgaria)
Čeština (Bahasa Ceko)
Dansk (Bahasa Denmark)
Deutsch (Bahasa Jerman)
English (Bahasa Inggris)
Español - España (Bahasa Spanyol - Spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (Bahasa Spanyol - Amerika Latin)
Ελληνικά (Bahasa Yunani)
Français (Bahasa Prancis)
Italiano (Bahasa Italia)
Magyar (Bahasa Hungaria)
Nederlands (Bahasa Belanda)
Norsk (Bahasa Norwegia)
Polski (Bahasa Polandia)
Português (Portugis - Portugal)
Português-Brasil (Bahasa Portugis-Brasil)
Română (Bahasa Rumania)
Русский (Bahasa Rusia)
Suomi (Bahasa Finlandia)
Svenska (Bahasa Swedia)
Türkçe (Bahasa Turki)
Tiếng Việt (Bahasa Vietnam)
Українська (Bahasa Ukraina)
Laporkan kesalahan penerjemahan
it might,who knows
fun fact: r7/9 300 series is basicly rebrand of 200 series with NO PERFORMANCE INCREASE
only more rams
check your gpu or cpu usage whilst playing... if one is constantly in the 80s or 90s it is or is near bottleneck....
edit: I had a 280x & i5 4590, got a gtx 980 and didnt see an increase, other than display resolution, though i didnt care for anything above 1920x1080
FX 6x series 3 Modules, Each Module has 2 cores simulates 3 cores in Majority Games
FX 8x series 4 Modules, Each Module has 2 cores, simulates 4 cores in Majority Games
Now for example Overclocking the FX 6300 will benefit more in games than a FX 8350.
It takes all cores running to reach its full potential meaning for FX 8350 its 4ghz - 4.2ghz
The FX 6300 is 3.5 to 4.1 ghz not overclocked, Now Most games use 2-4 cores except BF4 and BF1, Crysis 3 and Frostbyte engine games use all cores. In most games it will only use 2-4 cores for FX 8350 this is not best for full potential meaning the CPU shouldn't bottleneck; but because all the cores and IPC is not being used it will give lower performance causing a bottleneck.
The best for you for now is to keep your FX 6300 and Overclock it to 4.3-4.7 ghz try to get as much as you can from that processor since If games use 2-4 cores from a FX 6300 you should in theory and I have tested before be getting better performance than the FX 8350 which is weaker when using less cores than a FX 6300.
Pros to moving to FX 8350 at this time is just better multitasking meaning less lag when recording or rendering videos while doing other task.
Cons, You will have more bottleneck in games that use 1-4 cores because of the fact its using less IPC when not using all 8 cores at 90-100% usage. So for the comment below me @El_Hood you are not getting ~+50fps, you just think that since CS GO is gpu based and works great with no bottleneck on both 4 core AMD and I3 processors.
I would suggest overclock your cpu and keep it, and save your money for a better mobo and newer cpu with ddr4 instead of ddr3.
Another suggestion is move to Intel I5, 6500k ~ 200 USD with a 100$ Mobo and 40 - 60 dollar DDR4 of 8 or 16 gb, you will enjoy more frames on more games even if the games do not fully utilize all cores, each intel core IPC is quite a long ways better than AMD cores
Why did you necro a 7 year old thread?
Accidentally.