Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

Ver estadísticas:
Valuab7e 7 DIC 2016 a las 9:51 a. m.
Change VAC-System with BattlEye-Anticheat
At the moment, i have realized that CSGO after having VAC System not many cheaters get banned.. Right now i had 2 Cheaters in Enemy Team on a (Prime Matchmaking) and they were walling and all that.

Match Copylink: steam://rungame/730/76561202255233023/+csgo_download_match%20CSGO-9Dep5-FmSn7-DEMdt-BY5Xf-CQVPA

I suggest they should remove VAC on CSGO and input BattlEye Anti-Cheat instead since it always works on banning cheaters in Battlefield Games and Unturned is using BattlEye-Anticheat aswell, they are successfully banning so many Hackers at once which i was so happy about, but i feel bad that CSGO has no BattlEye Anti-Cheat client to not let Hackers into the Game..

Change the VAC Anti-Cheat with BattlEye Anti-Cheat so we can have a hackerfree Game. (Which means no more Hackers in CSGO) and I hope that Valve will do it. Otherwise we won't have a hackerfree Game and most Players will leave to another Game such as Battlefield 1 or even other ones.

- Best regards by Hamad 13
< >
Mostrando 16-30 de 34 comentarios
Bubbles 7 DIC 2016 a las 11:16 a. m. 
Publicado originalmente por Hamad 13:
Publicado originalmente por Juan, The Mexican Apple Thief:

There certainly has been a steep increase in cheaters, things that contribute to this is steamsales, the already low price for CSGO and the new inferno seemed to have sparked some cheating aswell.

They will not go for insta banning and that is for a very easy reason you don't seem to understand, if cheaters get instabanned they will not enjoy their cheating so they will not buy a new account. Eventhough it is at the expense of their players it is a sweet cashflow for Valve, They benefit from letting cheaters play for a few days to make it 'worth it' for them so they WILL buy another account.

You seem to underestimate how ♥♥♥♥♥♥ up valve and gaben are when it comes down to more profit.


I definetly agree on that one!

Thanks but it's a shame nonetheless, it's ridiculous that they have a no name or shame policy...
That ♥♥♥♥ is just ridiculous, if you supply valid proof they are still basically saying aww we don't want cheaters to feel bad or get ripped on...
Valuab7e 7 DIC 2016 a las 11:20 a. m. 
Publicado originalmente por Juan, The Mexican Apple Thief:
Publicado originalmente por Hamad 13:


I definetly agree on that one!

Thanks but it's a shame nonetheless, it's ridiculous that they have a no name or shame policy...
That ♥♥♥♥ is just ridiculous, if you supply valid proof they are still basically saying aww we don't want cheaters to feel bad or get ripped on...

Hahaha, alrighty
Ξ︎∨○︎L∨Ξ 7 DIC 2016 a las 11:22 a. m. 
Publicado originalmente por Report:
Valve won't make any profit if they insta ban cheats. This is the reason why vac is so slow and overwatch is never updated or added new features
Nonsense, VAC can be slow because it scans players' historical databases. So cheaters with undetectable hacks can still be busted later when VAC is updated.
Ξ︎∨○︎L∨Ξ 7 DIC 2016 a las 11:23 a. m. 
People who say the number of cheaters is increasing, must be new to the game or they are just delusional. The biggest cheater infestation was around 2014-2015, VAC has been improved a lot since and with Prime matchmaking it became so much better.
Ξ︎∨○︎L∨Ξ 7 DIC 2016 a las 11:35 a. m. 
Publicado originalmente por Sheetzy:
i thought vac was delayed so when the ban wave comes it effects months of players instead of a few days, since instabanning alerts the cheat makers faster than delayed banning so they can update the hacks to be undetected
It's probably a bit of both, but I know VAC is constantly scanning player history over and over and people can get banned months or even years after they cheated, when that particular hack is added to VAC's database. VAC also has server sided detection, i think they have some delay so people can't warn eachother. But i really don't know exactly.
Valuab7e 7 DIC 2016 a las 12:13 p. m. 
Publicado originalmente por ❃ h u m a n o i d:
Publicado originalmente por Sheetzy:
i thought vac was delayed so when the ban wave comes it effects months of players instead of a few days, since instabanning alerts the cheat makers faster than delayed banning so they can update the hacks to be undetected
It's probably a bit of both, but I know VAC is constantly scanning player history over and over and people can get banned months or even years after they cheated, when that particular hack is added to VAC's database. VAC also has server sided detection, i think they have some delay so people can't warn eachother. But i really don't know exactly.

So wait a minute, you say i'm new to the game because i dont think that VAC takes a long time to ban a person? Dude you only got 900h and i got 1.100h and yea i did experience the Hack Infestation in 2015 ^^
Lega 7 DIC 2016 a las 12:24 p. m. 
Publicado originalmente por Juan, The Mexican Apple Thief:
Publicado originalmente por Legatus:


Defently not true......If tehy ban more,all cheaters must buy a new account. This isnt the reason .

There certainly has been a steep increase in cheaters, things that contribute to this is steamsales, the already low price for CSGO and the new inferno seemed to have sparked some cheating aswell.

They will not go for insta banning and that is for a very easy reason you don't seem to understand, if cheaters get instabanned they will not enjoy their cheating so they will not buy a new account. Eventhough it is at the expense of their players it is a sweet cashflow for Valve, They benefit from letting cheaters play for a few days to make it 'worth it' for them so they WILL buy another account.

You seem to underestimate how ♥♥♥♥♥♥ up valve and gaben are when it comes down to more profit.

it exsist some clear reason why people arent banned instantly...

Cheater and cheatcoder mustn't know which fail is fault......Cheater will improof more and more if they know....


They will buy another account anyway....or tehy stop cheating,but this arrgument about instant ban is defently not true.

They know they had cheat, the shock is the same.
Lega 7 DIC 2016 a las 12:25 p. m. 
Publicado originalmente por de_Valuab7e:
Publicado originalmente por ❃ h u m a n o i d:
It's probably a bit of both, but I know VAC is constantly scanning player history over and over and people can get banned months or even years after they cheated, when that particular hack is added to VAC's database. VAC also has server sided detection, i think they have some delay so people can't warn eachother. But i really don't know exactly.

So wait a minute, you say i'm new to the game because i dont think that VAC takes a long time to ban a person? Dude you only got 900h and i got 1.100h and yea i did experience the Hack Infestation in 2015 ^^


Sometimes they need long and sometimes not.....but defently not instant because (read my other post)
Lega 7 DIC 2016 a las 12:32 p. m. 
At least,idk battleeye because i dont play any games of them....

But the most anticheatsystems are like vac...(fairfight,punkbuster etc)

Idk why they dont do more at this time but im sure they will improof vac to some higher leve.

The problem is,the most payed cheats arent rly good.....and if valve improof they do the same.

So maybe thsi will never change.
Lega 7 DIC 2016 a las 12:35 p. m. 
Valve rolls some update out...all what cheatcoder have to do,is look for some changes and change a bit after at the cheatengine.......

Anticheat isnt ez....
Technomite_ 7 DIC 2016 a las 12:36 p. m. 
Ugh. Vac delays bans so that cheat developers don't get instant feedback when testing their cheats. If bans were instant, cheat developers could quickly issolate the bit of code giving them the bans and make the cheat undetectable.
Valuab7e 7 DIC 2016 a las 12:36 p. m. 
Publicado originalmente por Legatus:
Valve rolls some update out...all what cheatcoder have to do,is look for some changes and change a bit after at the cheatengine.......

Anticheat isnt ez....

Agree.
Vaulty 7 DIC 2016 a las 12:41 p. m. 
They won't insta ban cheaters because that would make too easy for cheat developers to make a anti cheat... and instead having cheaters who got banned by vac after x days we would have cheaters that would never be banned...

also battleeye is worse version of VAC... battleeye is used by games where cheating isn't that "needed" by some people...


also most of the cheats are changed daily.. that's why VAC takes so much time to find and ban new cheat... and VAC works in more games that's why they need to make sure that vac won't get any false positives
Lega 7 DIC 2016 a las 12:43 p. m. 
Publicado originalmente por Hakur6969_:
Ugh. Vac delays bans so that cheat developers don't get instant feedback when testing their cheats. If bans were instant, cheat developers could quickly issolate the bit of code giving them the bans and make the cheat undetectable.

Exactly..

I mean they can ez do more but ill guess they know cheatcoder have a lot room for improvement.

Im sure valve care about this....it feels bad for the people but they care im sure.
DorylPlz 20 FEB 2017 a las 4:27 p. m. 
Battle eye is one of the best A-C i ever seen, r6s was a cheaters nest before B.E, now i prefer rainbow because of B.E.
Arma, Insurgency uses B.E too...
< >
Mostrando 16-30 de 34 comentarios
Por página: 1530 50

Publicado el: 7 DIC 2016 a las 9:51 a. m.
Mensajes: 34