安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Because they're just skins and e-sport games shouldn't have pay2win formula...
Good for you I guess?
A real E-Sport should not require you to buy something to make sure you're not at a disadvantage, a real E-Sport sets all players at same playing field as everybody else.
Other sports like football, basketball, tennis, etc. Does not have a Pay2Win formula, they rely on a player's skill, not how deep his pockets are.
Then you've just explained yourself that CS:GO is better supported. If the team that has paid to win usually wins then its a very boring tournament of who got the most money to get the AK that reloads faster or damages more, sports is never about who got the most money, but who has the best skill & strategies.
Any games that sells perks or special guns behind a paywall should not be considered an E-Sport, but rather just a videogame.