Cài đặt Steam
Đăng nhập
|
Ngôn ngữ
简体中文 (Hán giản thể)
繁體中文 (Hán phồn thể)
日本語 (Nhật)
한국어 (Hàn Quốc)
ไทย (Thái)
Български (Bungari)
Čeština (CH Séc)
Dansk (Đan Mạch)
Deutsch (Đức)
English (Anh)
Español - España (Tây Ban Nha - TBN)
Español - Latinoamérica (Tây Ban Nha cho Mỹ Latin)
Ελληνικά (Hy Lạp)
Français (Pháp)
Italiano (Ý)
Bahasa Indonesia (tiếng Indonesia)
Magyar (Hungary)
Nederlands (Hà Lan)
Norsk (Na Uy)
Polski (Ba Lan)
Português (Tiếng Bồ Đào Nha - BĐN)
Português - Brasil (Bồ Đào Nha - Brazil)
Română (Rumani)
Русский (Nga)
Suomi (Phần Lan)
Svenska (Thụy Điển)
Türkçe (Thổ Nhĩ Kỳ)
Українська (Ukraine)
Báo cáo lỗi dịch thuật
Love and greetings :)
Right, when you successfully dual cast you cast a one spell with both hands as opposed to two spells. This is better for non-destruction spells, at least in terms of damage vs cost. Dual cast destruction spells do 2.2x the damage for 2.8x the cost. You'll be able to do more damage just casting with both hands.
Same for restoration, the boost in healing is not cost-effective. Illusion and Conjuration benifit from this more, as Illusion will affect higher level foes and conjured minions/weapons will last longer, and you usually won't be casting them so often taht you run out of magicka.
The only reason you'd want to use it with Destruction is for the Impact Perk. When an opponent is hit by a dual cast destruction spell it stuns them, and the duration is such that you can permanently stun-lock an enemy,
Thank :)
That's what i'm saying, dual casting destruction spells is not worth it without the Impact Perk, you'll do less damage and get less XP overall. The increased costs are not worth the small damage increase.
I only ever use fireball. and its only REALLY useful for hunting deer and other wildlife that run away. considering how broken the smithing and enchanting make combat for doing damage.
Thanks dude! After houndreds of hours the enlightenment :D