Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
Love and greetings :)
Right, when you successfully dual cast you cast a one spell with both hands as opposed to two spells. This is better for non-destruction spells, at least in terms of damage vs cost. Dual cast destruction spells do 2.2x the damage for 2.8x the cost. You'll be able to do more damage just casting with both hands.
Same for restoration, the boost in healing is not cost-effective. Illusion and Conjuration benifit from this more, as Illusion will affect higher level foes and conjured minions/weapons will last longer, and you usually won't be casting them so often taht you run out of magicka.
The only reason you'd want to use it with Destruction is for the Impact Perk. When an opponent is hit by a dual cast destruction spell it stuns them, and the duration is such that you can permanently stun-lock an enemy,
Thank :)
That's what i'm saying, dual casting destruction spells is not worth it without the Impact Perk, you'll do less damage and get less XP overall. The increased costs are not worth the small damage increase.
I only ever use fireball. and its only REALLY useful for hunting deer and other wildlife that run away. considering how broken the smithing and enchanting make combat for doing damage.
Thanks dude! After houndreds of hours the enlightenment :D