Wasteland 3

Wasteland 3

檢視統計資料:
SkiRich 2021 年 1 月 3 日 下午 1:57
Wind-That-Tangles - Possible Spoiler
Any reason I should let this chcarcter live?
Seems like he really didnt pay for his crimes, so why not klill him and tell Betsy, and walk away with loot.
Unless this character has some future interactions.
< >
目前顯示第 1-6 則留言,共 6
Du-Vu 2021 年 1 月 3 日 下午 2:11 
It's mostly a roleplaying decision. He seems to sincerely regret what he did, but yeah, is that really enough? Because then you could apply the same same logic to the Patriarch.

The question is whether bringing him (Wind-That-Tangles or the Patriarch) to justice is worth the chaos that will follow when you bring him down. In Wind's case, you can't kill or arrest him without also killing Nikki and her dogs, and they are somewhat innocent. But you can't spare them without fighting Betsy. So there's no way of doing it that leaves your hands completely clean, and that's pretty much the theme of the game.
最後修改者:Du-Vu; 2021 年 1 月 3 日 下午 2:12
Radiac 2021 年 1 月 3 日 下午 4:16 
Reasons:
1. When we meet him, he's defenseless. Are you going to just play God and murder people for personal spite or revenge? And it's not even your revenge, it's someone else's.

2. He was a member of a cult that turns people into kites and lets them fly into the sky as some kind of crazy religious ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥, but he got out, and now he doesn't do that anymore.

3. All he did was guide the people from one place to another. He personally didn't kill anyone or order anyone else to kill anyone.

4. The Patriarch, whom you are working for, ostensibly, was the one who actually condemned those people to be taken by the Godfishers with the cover story lie that they were going to a "work camp". If you're going to kill the guy that did the wilderness guide job to ensure the people got from one place to another safely, sShouldn't you also go kill the Patriarch now? He had a MUCH larger role in this whole debacle. And what about Frank Pappas, doesn't he also deserve to die for his part now too? All he did was drive the car, but he feels guilty enough to drink himself into oblivion over this.

5. The relatives that sent you there to find him just want petty revenge on a soft target, period. They want to lash out emotionally and make someone, anyone, pay for the murder of their relatives, but not if it means they're going to get hurt in the process. They don't ever even think about trying to get any payback from the Patriarch, the Marshals, Frank Pappas, who is still a well-connected ex-Marshal at this point, or even the Godfishers, who are ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ crazy, well armed, and very violent. Their desire (the relatives of the dead) for revenge is limited to only those people they can actually take in an easy fight with no expected losses on their part. If they had any balls or any real desire for justice, they'd protest the Patriarch in some way publicly or go on some sort of crusade against the Godfishers, who have them outnumbered like 100 to 1 and would basically slaughter them without a second thought, but they didn't do that. They tried to get you to murder some guy for them, or lead you to where he is so they can do it.
最後修改者:Radiac; 2021 年 1 月 3 日 下午 4:39
SkiRich 2021 年 1 月 3 日 下午 4:54 
Well if he didnt know that the trek he was doing for years was to send people to the Godfishers I'd have a moral dilemna here, but he was part of that cult and he knew what he was doing. Just following orders and being the least violent of the pack isnt enough. His actions directly contributed to deaths, and he was never punished for it.
Its an easy choice for me, no matter how angelic he is now.
Betsys' reasons have no relevance here, once I find out his role in that cult.

Now if he had a value to his life now, like taking action or helpng me bring down the cult, the patriarch, or some other way to repay his debt, then there could be some negotiation.
Alternatively if I could just arrest and jail him thats my preffered action but his girlfriend wont let that happen, so its a bullet then.
vectorViridian 2021 年 1 月 3 日 下午 5:45 
Or you can do what I did, which is let them both live by using the Hard Ass option on Betsy and talking her down. I feel that Wind-That-Tangles deserved to live because he didn't directly kill anyone, and was a different person now. Also, the dogs and Nikki are completely innocent as well. Betsy also doesn't need to die, but she shouldn't get to kill Wind-That-Tangles either. There are some pretty clear decisions for me on who to take out and not take out in this game, this was one.
最後修改者:vectorViridian; 2021 年 1 月 3 日 下午 5:45
SkiRich 2021 年 1 月 3 日 下午 7:47 
You have to love this game. The devs really thought out these moral compass choices. Its interesting to me how people react to these things.
最後修改者:SkiRich; 2021 年 1 月 4 日 上午 12:56
Radiac 2021 年 1 月 4 日 下午 12:07 
Wind is small cog in a much larger machine. He would probably have been turned into a kite by the Godfishers himself if he had disobeyed orders while he was a member. They're nut jobs. The people you SHOULD put on trial and then execute, if it comes to that, over this story are Saul Buchannon and like all of the remaining Godfishers. If it's justice you care about, and not petty revenge, the punishment should fit the crime, and I don't think what Wind did, given the circumstances, was a death-penalty level offense. Similarly, Frank Pappas doesn't really deserve to die either, I don't think.

I also didn't think Isaac Reed or MacTavish or Brygo deserved death by pillory, but I sent them all to Daisy just the same, because I'm not the judge and the law is what it is. Those people intentionally did stuff that they knew would result in them getting pilloried to death if they were ever caught, and they did it anyway, so they get what they know that have coming, under the law, such as it is, as established in their little safe corner of the Wasteland, like it or not. If you didn't want to live under that law, you should have moved to somewhere else.
< >
目前顯示第 1-6 則留言,共 6
每頁顯示: 1530 50

張貼日期: 2021 年 1 月 3 日 下午 1:57
回覆: 6