Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
First I'll tell you that the 400 or more hours that I spent on generation zero over the course of a few years, I liked it a lot, given the excellent support and development that the developers of this game have given and done, which is extremely rare to many years now.
Now I would like to understand (since in the group sbi took over it is not possible to open discussions), what are the characteristics, in the specific case of GZ, that distinguish it as a game in which sbi is involved, and I want to know precisely. because boycott or discriminate things "by hearsay" (either against or in favor of a thing) because only in the specific case sbi is involved, is not a valid reason and reason to do so. furthermore, perhaps where it is possible to do so, I would like to know what are the elements that distinguish the involvement of sbi in other video games or in general. Thank you
edit; because in all honesty, given the names of the sweet baby customers, the games you should play could be counted on the fingers of one hand...
It honestly doesn't mean anything or matter in any way.
It's a consulting company.
Someone gives them money, gives them pile of data, and literally states "is there anything you can see that we can do/improve?"
Did Systemic Reaction do so? Yes.
Did they use anything or listen to anything that SBi said? Only they know.
Does it matter in any way at all? Nope.
The biggest, baddest problem with SBi is that some games were put out that were, to be honest, total crap. And they make a good scapegoat, so fans of the publishers/developers don't need to question why 'their' publishers/developers made a crap game.
do you know that there are a lot of bad games that sbi isn't involved in, and that there are probably many more? Do you know that what one person may not like, another may like? do you know that valve is also involved with sbi and therefore those who support sbi detected should not play cs and should NOT use steam? do you know that there are a lot of people who get brainwashed as soon as someone creates hype on any topic? I don't think you responded with a valid argument, you are attackable from all sides
Ciemmevu writes "I want to know precisely" - in regards to the involvement of SBI with GZ.
Unless a GZ representative chooses to respond on this thread, the facts cannot be known. Any other post in this thread contains opinion and speculation.
Ciemmevu expands beyond GZ to ask: "I would like to know what are the elements that distinguish the involvement of sbi in other video games or in general."
That information would come from SBI directly: their website (which I have not looked at) should explain what they do.
edit: are you so sure you've never played a game from a software house that isn't involved with sbi? I say that you have played and maybe even many, as have all the others who are against and who will certainly play more.
I don't have a "crazy" emoji...so surprise is it.
A writing consultancy that specialises in story development.
I wished the walkie talkie will not be repaired but...