Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Not wanting to speak for the author, but I understand their comment to mean that they wish for additional gates so the keeper can access regions that might be connected only by terrain the animal can traverse - e.g. a rest area connected to the viewing area via a catflap style gate/door that is too small / high-up/ awkwardly shaped for a human to walk through.
You see this all the time in real zoos, I visited one with a wolf enclosure. Their main area was a big fenced in field, the keepers accessed this via a pair of 'airlock' gates large enough to get a wheelbarrrow through. The wolves also had an indoor enclosure attached to it. The wolves accessed it via a hatch about 1m square. The keepers accessed the indoor enclosure via a separate door of human proportions. Thus, the single wolf enclosure had two zones connected via a door used only by animals and featured two gates used by humans.
Hopefully this unconfuses you.
@Juniper - I wish for this also, because I think it would make those cool tiger bridges easier to make!
Perhaps if the airlock were non habitat but connected to the habitat walls?