Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Custom made barriers for habitats, to me, always are more interesting and can provide a natural look to your habitats.
It is all about transversable. Any construction and/or scenery pieces do not need anything at the top to prevent climbers from escaping as long as the barrier you make is not transversable for habitat animals. People may be using fencing at the top because either the barrier they made is climbable (like layered rocks) or because it looks more "realistic" or a combination of the two.
When you use construction and/or scenery pieces there is no strength grading involved. Grading only applies to game given barriers. Height is still a consideration because, depending on the species, a too low made barrier can be jumped or stepped over. Jumpers, however, can only jump so high up and so low down. African pots on the ground can prevent an elephant from escaping but, depending on width, a kangaroo can jump them or a giraffe can step over them. The easiest way is just use a height that is indicated on the game given barriers for that particular species.