Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
And the correct word would be 'improbable', not 'impossible', Because... it is possible.
And most importantly of all... it's a game... Doesn't have to be 100% correct on 100% everything...
UNLESS I am mistaken about them both effecting the same gene, I find it HIGHLY IRREGULAR that TWO animals should BOTH present with a leucistic phenotype while it's genotype carries both leucistic AND melanistic markers. That's all I'm saying. But, I am not intimately familiar with the specific genetic makeup of the European Fallow Deer, and so I could be wrong. as I do not know which specific gene(s) is/are effected.
And yes, I realise it's a game, but I was remarking specifically on how the game must handle those genetic markers separately. different to how they would naturally occur, and I found it fascinating.