Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
- Inbreeding only comes from animals that are related; mother/father/brother/sister/grandparents (up to four generations) so if the animals are not related then you will not get inbreeding, regardless of their bad genes
- I'm not sure if you know this, but you can compare mates, between male and females of the same species to determine the genetic quality their offspring can be
When you compare mates, you will see the four criteria, size, longevity, fertility and immunity gene potential. The red zone for each is the range that any offspring will fall in.
So, let’s say you have size for the mother at 50% and the father is 75%. Any offspring born will have their size randomised (roughly) between 50-75% which is the red zone.
I don't think it is absolute, I think you can get animals that are genetically "blessed" that will have better stats (or if you are unlucky worse stats) then what the red meter says. But it’s a good guide to work out the average genetic potential of any offspring