Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
LOL
You came up with macabre names. All people who reject animal food will agree with this. However, I doubt whether this is appropriate here.
Zoomaloo
Zoo Asia
Zoomerica
Zoopolis.
and of course the rather aptly named Sandbox 1 and Zoo 1.
(once I really get the hang of the game I'll come up with better names, I still feel like these are "tester" zoos)
It's tongue and cheek and my first zoo names were very tame, but after my first animal tragedy, I began a new zoo and that was Slaughterhouse, it made me laugh and honestly be more cautious. anyway, doubt away :)
First off, there's nothing macabre about these names. Especially not if you either go with them or completely turn people's expectations around (by having a fluffy bunny petting zoo, LOL).
Second... why would people who 'reject animal food' (what, they don't eat dog food or something? ... Yes, that was a joke, LOL) think these names are macabre? After all, if you're going to go that route, we are omnivores. So having a zoo that serves up their own animals, well, circle of life and all that. At least you'd know the animals had the best kind of life before being eaten.
And yes, this is tongue-in-cheek. Heavily. XD