Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
SCP-SL is Multiplayer
SCP-CB is Singleplayer
SCP:CB is a singleplayer horror game. It's a classic and has a great atmosphere. I played SCP:SL before CB but I must say that CB is a fantastic game for being free.
SCP:SL is a multiplayer game inspired by CB, but it is much less of a horror game and each round plays similairly. Both are free and are incredibly fun, though in different ways.
CB is fun as the horror can be both terrifying and thrilling, and SL is great because the multiplayer aspect of it gives it hundreds of hours of replayability.
SCP:SL has only been out for about a year or so.
SCP:SL will have to either get a large boost in the amount of devs, or wait a few years to have an amount of content comparable to CB.
If that were to happen, SL would end up being the better game due to the endless shenanigans of a bunch of idiots stumbling around trying to survive along with CB scale content.
Also, as of now, SCP:CB has graphics from 2012, with low resolution textures, bad lighting/shading, and a terribly unoptimized engine far past its lifespan, while SL has modern-ish graphics, and nothing like MAVs due to the choice of a stable engine like Unity.
Speaking of Unity, SCP:Unity is at stages even earlier than SL is in development, but it might be more adequate to compare those two when they are developed more, because SCP:Unity will essentially end up being a better CB, when it is finally out of early development hell.
What Napoleon said is essentially the best way to describe the difference between the two games.
When the day comes that SL will be as fleshed out as CB, perhaps even more so, i'll be a happy man.
If it were to have 10 years of development with the current mindset of the developers, it could easily end up being a game of the decade.
Also, I keep running on but i'd like to say that the framerate depends on your computer.
My computer can probably run SL better than it can run CB.
TL;DR: I'm tired and I don't know what i'm trying to say and this game needs more devs and SCP:Unity too so we can have super great games
SCP:SL is good if you just want to have fun.
No MTF squads to gun you down on sight (whoops, forgot about them)
No stupid campers (unless it is you, shame on you)
No Anti-jump cheat
No salty D-class to betray you
No one to shut doors in your face
More and Better scares
More (Functional) SCPs
What SL has over CB:
Gunz
Memez
The intercom room
The ability to play as an SCP
The ability to play as an MTF squad (member) and gun people down on sight
Respawn
The abiliy to kill SCPs
The ability to play with friends
You forgot: In SL you can find the Holy Peanut. Peanut from SL is the only true peanut.
edit: scp cb is better imo, even if it runs on 1000+ years old engine, also graphics don't matter