Автор сообщения: Johny

It feels very weird and out of place, why not one of the bosses from this game or curse of the moon? Or even castlevania cameo?
Even Kirby would possibly suit better

its a promotional cameo, and i agree it is a bit weird, but imo, it would be weirder to have a cameo from a character of the franchise that was the source inspiration, and even more odd considering the reason this game exists is because the ip owners cared little about the franchise or the opinion of the dev that made this game possible (iga).

also, imo, if the were going to include this kind of cameo, it would make more sense if it comes with a new bonus boss, enemies and items. without those, the "cameo" feels more like an "alternative skin", because the gameplay remains more or less the same.

as side note, i would prefer Hat Kid from A Hat In Time, with time freezing hat, and a few new cat enemies based in the "cat trains" from one of the expansion dlcs, and a few other ahit related things.

i also would like that rather than recycling the shard system for miriam, it used it in another way: ie the new character (ie hat kid) wouldnt use the shards, but could collect them, and player could switch between characters in the same file. this mode would make more sense in a "new game+" file

lovely character, great choice.

dev dont care what people say.... and over 1 months and no patch for working achvimnts are much sad.....

10+ gigabytes for a character I don't want, and it's out of the context, imho. Next time let me choose whether I want this kind of update or just skip it, thx

Thank you for taking such good care of your game.
Best of luck with the hotfix for the strange achievement bug, I look forward to finishing them when you are through.

Achievements doesen't work, please fix it.

I mean ... its fun but ... huh?

Achievements doesn't work still

Love Child of LIght. Who cares about the haters. It's randomly free content at this late game stage.

Did they broke modding support just so that Aurora doesn't show up in screenshots of naked monster ladies?

Автор сообщения: infantMajesty

Did they broke modding support just so that Aurora doesn't show up in screenshots of naked monster ladies?

No, the updated the version of Unreal Engine 4 that they were using, Unreal is kinda pissy about the files you change not being for the right version of the engine for some reason.

What a lame ass crossover. Complete waste of time.

wow

Free content that gives an entirely new character to play through without charging anything extra for it and the title was launched well over a year ago now. They've not asked for anything more than the initial purchase of the game.

Yet here they sit, complaining, criticizing, insulting even.
Honestly - what is the deal with the salt? Look at the past two weeks we've seen a game about Vampires that released in Early Access with TWO paid DLC's and then just today Blizz released F2P game that literally forces you to constantly fork over cash in order to progress through the game.

Seriously, at least show a little gratitude - That is some serious passion put in to a title that as long as their roadmap was correct - DID NOT need to include anything else.

Автор сообщения: webmetalreese

Free content that gives an entirely new character to play through without charging anything extra for it and the title was launched well over a year ago now. They've not asked for anything more than the initial purchase of the game.

Yet here they sit, complaining, criticizing, insulting even.
Honestly - what is the deal with the salt? Look at the past two weeks we've seen a game about Vampires that released in Early Access with TWO paid DLC's and then just today Blizz released F2P game that literally forces you to constantly fork over cash in order to progress through the game.

Seriously, at least show a little gratitude - That is some serious passion put in to a title that as long as their roadmap was correct - DID NOT need to include anything else.

Am I missing something, or are customers suddenly not supposed to have issues with a product when it turns out to be defective?

Because that's what v1.3.0 was: a defective product. The update broke the game, and we were forced to sit around and wait for it to be fixed for over a month. If this were a material product, you'd be ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ about it too.

But somehow, just because the game isn't filled with the standard predatory monetization of the industry, we're supposed to completely brush off any legitimate concerns we might have ?

You're delusional.