Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Game has been end of life for ages now......................
In fact, one should note, most racing games eventually are removed from being for sale due to how licensing works with car companies. Publishers are usually only allowed to sell a game for a certain number of years before they have to either stop selling it, or pay to license the cars again.
For most racing games paying for the license again is not in the cards because it would cost more for that than what they will ever make on that game again.
Even Gran Turismo games get delisted.
But it's not possible that the game costs now less than a DLC, which contains just 1 map. The game comes with several maps, so why should it cost less than a DLC that contains only 1 map? It makes no sense. At least, they could make these DLCs a lot cheaper and ideally just free. I'd just include most of them in the base game. It's not that they will make a lot of money from this game at this point. If they want players like me to stick around, they should make these DLCs available, so that we are happy and maybe buy the next Dirt Rally 3.0, if it ever comes out.
Why would they make DLC's free for a game that is more popular than the newly released tile?
well if your feeling christmas spirit you know
There is no such thing as "end of life" for a video game unless it is a "Live Service" game.
That's a mindset that is harmful to gaming and only benefits unscrupulous developers who want their games to "die" after a year or two so you can forget about them and throw Top Dollar at their latest Shiny New Thing.
That's up to you. All that matters is whether you believe a product is worth the asking price. If you like the game enough and think that a new map is worth the price of a coffee you'll pay it. If you don't, you won't.
I'm the biggest penny pincher alive, but you've got to be realistic and not get caught up on principles when those principles are effectively moot.