DiRT Rally 2.0

DiRT Rally 2.0

View Stats:
Frame rates and resolutions
is there any info on frame rates , at various graphics options? Is triple screen 4k possible @60fps minimum? I can run DiRT at 11520x2160 on medium high some ultra at 90fps. WRC7 wasn't possible at more than 35fps but it wasn't optimised for triple screen anyway.
< >
Showing 1-9 of 9 comments
HAAS Feb 18, 2019 @ 4:15pm 
Bump for a response?? I too would really like to know the answer to this.
I tried the 3-curved screen setup and found that as my "tunnel-vision" increased the two outside monitors motion blur would screw up my driving. Once I went back to a single the quality of my runs got better and better. Went from 10-second gaps to 30's and 40's.

I'm a connoisseur of eye-candy. Everything I play is max settings. So I really wish I could go back to 3 screens again, but it's just not possible anymore.

@Trev65...

How did it look on Dirt? And was it just Dirt or was it Dirt 4??
Last edited by HAAS; Feb 18, 2019 @ 4:16pm
Marius Feb 18, 2019 @ 4:21pm 
In DR and D4 you had a fisheye effect when using triples.
Crabs Jarrard Feb 18, 2019 @ 7:23pm 
In Dirt Rally 2.0, I'm able to keep things just over 60fps at 1440p Ultra on a 9900K and 1080 Ti. Some parts of the game seem really blurry/hazy, but the lighting is vastly superior to the first game and overall it has a nice visual improvement.
Frey Feb 19, 2019 @ 3:25am 
Originally posted by Crabs Jarrard:
In Dirt Rally 2.0, I'm able to keep things just over 60fps at 1440p Ultra on a 9900K and 1080 Ti. Some parts of the game seem really blurry/hazy, but the lighting is vastly superior to the first game and overall it has a nice visual improvement.

the landscapes are a really big step back since dirt 4... the Greece landscape was awesome in the dirt rally , but the DR2 landscapes feel like 1995 graphics....
Last edited by Frey; Feb 19, 2019 @ 3:26am
jack.anderson19 Feb 19, 2019 @ 5:17am 
Game does look bad like '95 , that's why I bought it ( memoirs )
Crash McWreakit VR Feb 19, 2019 @ 10:33am 
Originally posted by MlowBe:
Bump for a response?? I too would really like to know the answer to this.
I tried the 3-curved screen setup and found that as my "tunnel-vision" increased the two outside monitors motion blur would screw up my driving. Once I went back to a single the quality of my runs got better and better. Went from 10-second gaps to 30's and 40's.

I'm a connoisseur of eye-candy. Everything I play is max settings. So I really wish I could go back to 3 screens again, but it's just not possible anymore.

@Trev65...

How did it look on Dirt? And was it just Dirt or was it Dirt 4??


original Dirt looks great in 4K, as in most games shaders are turned off as they kill GPU performance I'm on a Titan X and an i5 something I forget what. I have played Dirt4 RX at 11520 and it performs well, frame rates up around 100 and looks better than Dirt.

As I said in WRC7 something up with the graphics in that game as it didn't have triple screen support as far as I'm aware you could run it in 4K res as 11520 but even with everything low FXAA off etc 35fps was about it, so ran a custom res 7860x1600 on that.

So hoping CM haven't gone overkill and made 2.0 impossible for triple 4k play
Frey Feb 19, 2019 @ 1:01pm 
Originally posted by Trev65:
Originally posted by MlowBe:
Bump for a response?? I too would really like to know the answer to this.
I tried the 3-curved screen setup and found that as my "tunnel-vision" increased the two outside monitors motion blur would screw up my driving. Once I went back to a single the quality of my runs got better and better. Went from 10-second gaps to 30's and 40's.

I'm a connoisseur of eye-candy. Everything I play is max settings. So I really wish I could go back to 3 screens again, but it's just not possible anymore.

@Trev65...

How did it look on Dirt? And was it just Dirt or was it Dirt 4??


original Dirt looks great in 4K, as in most games shaders are turned off as they kill GPU performance I'm on a Titan X and an i5 something I forget what. I have played Dirt4 RX at 11520 and it performs well, frame rates up around 100 and looks better than Dirt.

As I said in WRC7 something up with the graphics in that game as it didn't have triple screen support as far as I'm aware you could run it in 4K res as 11520 but even with everything low FXAA off etc 35fps was about it, so ran a custom res 7860x1600 on that.

So hoping CM haven't gone overkill and made 2.0 impossible for triple 4k play

your triple 4k is a dream, even a rtx 2080ti can't render at 4k ultra AAX8 60fps.....if you like playing at very low it's your right.....You make laugh so much with your triple 4k....
Crash McWreakit VR Feb 21, 2019 @ 10:56am 
if you have 4k you dont need to run AA at all or at least lowest setting if you want to tidy up the tiniest of edges. AA is a frame rate killer.
Frey Feb 21, 2019 @ 12:46pm 
Originally posted by Trev65:
if you have 4k you dont need to run AA at all or at least lowest setting if you want to tidy up the tiniest of edges. AA is a frame rate killer.
wrong. you need AA everytime and with 32 inch or more it's awfull without AA.
I call AA beauty render, i love it.
Last edited by Frey; Feb 21, 2019 @ 12:47pm
< >
Showing 1-9 of 9 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Feb 18, 2019 @ 11:57am
Posts: 9