Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
"Game is good, the only real cons is that enemies are too static, everything else is good". So you expect a 7.5-8/10 reading all that. Scroll down and... 6/10. Also, people seems to don't understand that in a game that last 50 hours you can't review the first 4 hours.
Yeah. I think they all either:
A. Rushed through it.
B. Did not finish a playthrough.
It sounded like they did not even finish the game. Like they did not even mention the NG+ addition.
Oh I did. And it did the game lots of injustice.
They are just intolerant of Asian culture. Which is ironic because they refer to themselves as tolerant progressives. Aka left Democrats.
Exactly. With Code Vein's score of 7/10 they are implying that it is only slightly better than Anthem. Which is a load of bull. Anthem is an awful game that deserved a 3-4/10.