Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
campaign mod
Not having bought this game, I finally got around to watching a YouTube video of some of the game play.
It gives you a chance to play as part of a bigger battle, but probably and at-least-not-usually a big enough part to actually effect the outcome of the battle much.
Even if, hypothetically, you're on a severely outnumbered/overwelmed side, it still tries to simulate that experience.
Having realized this (or to use a better word, "having theorized this,) I think it both helps explain why there are so many positive reviews with short playtimes, and makes me more inclined to buy the game...
It might be fun to try out the various perspectives of the simulated (though probably and apparently pretty "stupid") combatants, regardless of whether the overall strategy controlling the other units makes much sense.
If someone want to quote this post and add a short comment such as "yes" or "probably", I might mark it as answer to my question; unfortinately, Steam won't let non-moderators like myself do that to their own posts otherwise. (I can mark any reply to original post as "an answer" except for this one and any other ones I make myself.)